I have slipped to under 10:1 and don't like it.
Could I get a tp or twenty for these posts for heavans sake!!!:
78 Celtics Basketball / Celtics Talk / Re: Danny Ainge confirms talks; KG's agent says he's in the loop on: July 30, 2007, 11:20:41 AM
hey we will all miss Al but being 42-6 at the break is going to make it easier
yeah that was pretty good and this is good too:
93 Celtics Basketball / Celtics Talk / Re: Garnett can now demand a trade to us. We are one big move away on: June 30, 2007, 03:52:32 PM
its only obvious that we are now attractive to Garnett. If we are number two or three, it dosn't really matter when McHale isn't going to want to trade to Phoenix if he can get the celts to match it, and I think our package beats theirs. He knows Al is a great guy and has dealt with DA
before(duh) Frankly if it isn't obvious McHale would deal to us before Phoenix, well there is no explaining anything
to someone who can't get that concept.
94 Celtics Basketball / Celtics Talk / Garnett can now demand a trade to us. We are one big move away on: June 29, 2007, 04:07:45 PM
Garnett can now look at us and say we are his best option. He can win a title here.
With Perk getting 26 min at center and KG 22 we are covered. Davis will become a good back up at pf now, KG can do 16 minutes+ there. The rest of the starting lineup with PP, Ray Allen and Rondo wins a title if Rondo develops fast. TA must be kept to solidify the bench. Gomes also. Pruitt will be fine also
McHale will have to trade KG to us. Our previous offer was the best he could have had but now it drops to Al, Gerald, and next years pick, plus we let the one we have from them go back to them. That's enough and Kg will do it and so will McHale.
If we want to pick up a veteran free agent point we can do that too, but I saw Pruitt pla and he will be adequate behind RR. Its RR that has to step up and TA and all have to be healthy
So there is Chicago. McHale likes Al better than anything Chicago can send to him as a foundation for a trade.
Its only obvious if Garnett goes anywhere it will be here with one if: Does Danny still want to do it? Not so sure about that. And should we want it? I think so. We'd get 3-4 years out of that team, imho