Poll

Which player(s) would be the best option to trade White + Robinson for from a tanking team?

Michael Porter Jr. (Brooklyn Nets - 1 year)
0 (0%)
Zion Williamson + Yves Missi (New Orleans Pelicans - 2 years)
1 (100%)
Darius Garland (Los Angeles Clippers - 2 years)
0 (0%)
Brandon Ingram + Brook Lopez (Los Angeles Clippers - 1 year + PO Ingram)
0 (0%)
Nicolas Claxton + Norman Powell (Chicago Bulls - 2 years)
0 (0%)
Domantas Sabonis (Sacramento Kings - 2 years)
0 (0%)
Zach LaVine (Sacramento Kings - 1 year)
0 (0%)
Tyler Herro + Caris LeVert (Milwaukee Bucks - 1 year)
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Voting closes: December 10, 2026, 03:59:25 PM

Author Topic: Tanking team target: Who is the best option to improve + shred long term salary?  (Read 80 times)

Vermont Green, snively and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online RodyTur10

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2893
  • Tommy Points: 307
  • Always offline from 9pm till 1am
The season has just started, but already it's clear that some teams will not be competitive this season and may be interested during the course of the season to trade good player(s) for assets.

Considering the situation of the Celtics the list of options in the poll are small.

What we assume here is that we are willing to trade Derrick White and Mitchell Robinson (and perhaps add Jordan Walsh), since we believe their performances are and will be subpar for their contracts 3 years running. And we obviously don't want to go into the tax this year and we look here to shred longterm salary. So total contracts of around 40-50 million with max 2 years remaining.

A team with a bad record, but probably don't want to give up their best player(s) yet is Indiana (Siakam). With Washington (Davis) and Phoenix (Booker) the problem is that we would probably end up in the tax (both earning 55M+) making the trade. Orlando (Banchero etc.) and Utah (Markkanen) I have excluded since their long contracts wouldn't help with our longterm payroll.

We would have to give up assets, in some cases a bit more than others, but I wouldn't expect something extravagant. Would you entertain these options, you have 3 votes? Or have you some construction of plater(s) in the same thinking line that I haven't considered? Disclaimer that Robinson and Harper can be traded as of December 15th.

Online Goldstar88

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16235
  • Tommy Points: 1867
I think any of those options make the Celtics worse. D-White is the starting PG. Losing him would leave a huge void, especially on the defensive side.
« Last Edit: Today at 04:19:21 PM by Goldstar88 »
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Online RodyTur10

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2893
  • Tommy Points: 307
  • Always offline from 9pm till 1am
I think any of those options make the Celtics worse. D-White is the starting PG. Losing him would leave a huge void, especially on the defensive side.

I think so too. Always loved Derrick White and I was thrilled after Stevens made the trade. He has been awesome, but I do worry about his production.

Not within this exercise, but without White I'd entertain something like Lopez + Dunn for Robinson + Walsh. Short term veterans and adding flexibility.

(Edit: looking at Spotrac I see that Paul George + Mitchell Robinson for Anthony Davis is a popular proposal)
« Last Edit: Today at 04:49:08 PM by RodyTur10 »

Online Vermont Green

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15787
  • Tommy Points: 1132
None of those trade make sense to me, from a BOS standpoint.  I predict that White and Robinson are going to be fine.