Author Topic: Impact at the Rim  (Read 680 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Impact at the Rim
« on: Yesterday at 02:12:29 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 65157
  • Tommy Points: -25336
  • Optionality: Cope Springs Eternal
At the end of our playoff exit, everyone was giving assessments of why we lost.  Brad Stevens had his own thoughts:

Quote
We had a hard time generating really good looks on that first shot. We?ve got to figure out a way to do better with that. One of the things we?ve got to figure out is how to have more of an impact at the rim. And we do need to add to our team to do that.?

This season we've downgraded our "rim impact" by trading JB for George.  The Mitchell Robinson signing should help, but he only takes roughly 3.5 shots per game.

So, where does the impact at the rim come from?  If it was a source of concern the last two playoff runs according to Brad, how do we improve it?
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 04:08:06 PM by Roy H. »
I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 02:23:32 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27215
  • Tommy Points: 2828
At the end of our playoff exit, everyone was giving assessments of why were lost.  Brad Stevens had his own thoughts:

Quote
We had a hard time generating really good looks on that first shot. We?ve got to figure out a way to do better with that. One of the things we?ve got to figure out is how to have more of an impact at the rim. And we do need to add to our team to do that.?

This season we've downgraded our "rim impact" by trading JB for George.  The Mitchell Robinson signing should help, but he only takes roughly 3.5 shots per game.

So, where does the impact at the rim come from?  If it was a source of concern the last two playoff runs according to Brad, how do we improve it?

It improves a bit with JT replacing JB. Other improvement
 has to come from existing player improvement or refocus. I think Q may provide some. Some from PP and DW.

And then, the less likely but yet unknown - will we see any of Baylor, Hugo, Walsh, or RHJ attack the rim with success consistently?

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 02:46:52 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34152
  • Tommy Points: 10358
At the end of our playoff exit, everyone was giving assessments of why were lost.  Brad Stevens had his own thoughts:

Quote
We had a hard time generating really good looks on that first shot. We?ve got to figure out a way to do better with that. One of the things we?ve got to figure out is how to have more of an impact at the rim. And we do need to add to our team to do that.?

This season we've downgraded our "rim impact" by trading JB for George.  The Mitchell Robinson signing should help, but he only takes roughly 3.5 shots per game.

So, where does the impact at the rim come from?  If it was a source of concern the last two playoff runs according to Brad, how do we improve it?

It improves a bit with JT replacing JB. Other improvement
 has to come from existing player improvement or refocus. I think Q may provide some. Some from PP and DW.

And then, the less likely but yet unknown - will we see any of Baylor, Hugo, Walsh, or RHJ attack the rim with success consistently?
having JT instead of JB does not improve it.  JB is the one more likely to drive even if it results in a mid-range shot or an occasional TO.  JT is more likely to launch an iso 3 after pounding the ball into the floor for 10-12 seconds of the possession

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 03:43:39 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15847
  • Tommy Points: 1842
At the end of our playoff exit, everyone was giving assessments of why were lost.  Brad Stevens had his own thoughts:

Quote
We had a hard time generating really good looks on that first shot. We?ve got to figure out a way to do better with that. One of the things we?ve got to figure out is how to have more of an impact at the rim. And we do need to add to our team to do that.?

This season we've downgraded our "rim impact" by trading JB for George.  The Mitchell Robinson signing should help, but he only takes roughly 3.5 shots per game.

So, where does the impact at the rim come from?  If it was a source of concern the last two playoff runs according to Brad, how do we improve it?

It improves a bit with JT replacing JB. Other improvement
 has to come from existing player improvement or refocus. I think Q may provide some. Some from PP and DW.

And then, the less likely but yet unknown - will we see any of Baylor, Hugo, Walsh, or RHJ attack the rim with success consistently?
having JT instead of JB does not improve it.  JB is the one more likely to drive even if it results in a mid-range shot or an occasional TO.  JT is more likely to launch an iso 3 after pounding the ball into the floor for 10-12 seconds of the possession

JT is more than capable of attacking. He averaged over 8 FT attempts per game a few seasons ago. JB has never done that.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 03:44:12 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15847
  • Tommy Points: 1842
At the end of our playoff exit, everyone was giving assessments of why were lost.  Brad Stevens had his own thoughts:

Quote
We had a hard time generating really good looks on that first shot. We?ve got to figure out a way to do better with that. One of the things we?ve got to figure out is how to have more of an impact at the rim. And we do need to add to our team to do that.?

This season we've downgraded our "rim impact" by trading JB for George.  The Mitchell Robinson signing should help, but he only takes roughly 3.5 shots per game.

So, where does the impact at the rim come from?  If it was a source of concern the last two playoff runs according to Brad, how do we improve it?

It improves a bit with JT replacing JB. Other improvement
 has to come from existing player improvement or refocus. I think Q may provide some. Some from PP and DW.

And then, the less likely but yet unknown - will we see any of Baylor, Hugo, Walsh, or RHJ attack the rim with success consistently?
having JT instead of JB does not improve it.  JB is the one more likely to drive even if it results in a mid-range shot or an occasional TO.  JT is more likely to launch an iso 3 after pounding the ball into the floor for 10-12 seconds of the possession

JT is more than capable of attacking. He averaged over 8 FT attempts per game a few seasons ago. JB has never done that.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 04:04:55 PM »

Offline SparzWizard

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20384
  • Tommy Points: 1189
Or maybe, demand from the coach that the players need to attack the rim more (maybe 75% of the time) and stop settling for 3s 24/7.


#FireJoe
#JokeMazulla 2026
#JTJB (Just Trade Jaylen Brown) - Mission Accomplished 2026
I am the Master of Panic.

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 04:13:28 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 65157
  • Tommy Points: -25336
  • Optionality: Cope Springs Eternal
At the end of our playoff exit, everyone was giving assessments of why were lost.  Brad Stevens had his own thoughts:

Quote
We had a hard time generating really good looks on that first shot. We?ve got to figure out a way to do better with that. One of the things we?ve got to figure out is how to have more of an impact at the rim. And we do need to add to our team to do that.?

This season we've downgraded our "rim impact" by trading JB for George.  The Mitchell Robinson signing should help, but he only takes roughly 3.5 shots per game.

So, where does the impact at the rim come from?  If it was a source of concern the last two playoff runs according to Brad, how do we improve it?

It improves a bit with JT replacing JB. Other improvement
 has to come from existing player improvement or refocus. I think Q may provide some. Some from PP and DW.

And then, the less likely but yet unknown - will we see any of Baylor, Hugo, Walsh, or RHJ attack the rim with success consistently?

I alluded to it, but did not quote that Brad mentioned it was a concern in the past two playoff series losses. So, that includes when we had both Tatum and Brown. He seemed to want something in addition to those two, and now we only have one with no replacement for the skill set that he thinks is essential.

It puzzles me, and just makes it seem even more clear that the team really didn't have a plan coming into the off-season. Or, the quote was in regard to Giannis, and he really thought we were going to get him. Because, not only did we not really improve our impact at the rim, we got quite a bit worse at it.

Note:  Brad was talking about offensive impact. I don't think there's any real question that that were rim defense and rebounding should be improved.
I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 04:40:54 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15847
  • Tommy Points: 1842
JT is more than capable of attacking. He averaged 8.5 FT attempts per game one season. That is more than JB has ever done.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 04:53:53 PM by Goldstar88 »
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 04:56:50 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34152
  • Tommy Points: 10358
JT is more than capable of attacking. He averaged 8.5 FT attempts per game one season. That is more than JB has ever done.
JT's definitely more than capable of doing it.  he just doesn't do it nearly enough.

JB, as everyone who watches the games has seen, does not get a fair whistle from the refs so that's part of the reason his FT rate isn't higher.  if he got an equitable whistle to what other all-stars get, he'd easily get 2 more trips to the line for 4 more FT attempts and that's being conservative.

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 04:58:16 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34152
  • Tommy Points: 10358
Or maybe, demand from the coach that the players need to attack the rim more (maybe 75% of the time) and stop settling for 3s 24/7.
a change in coaching philosophy (or better yet, a change in the coach) should have been the approach this offseason before giving away our second best player

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #10 on: Today at 08:45:58 AM »

Offline smicker16

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 299
  • Tommy Points: 37
It did feel like this was setting the stage for a Giannis trade and trying to get the fanbase to understand why they wanted to trade JB for him. When that fell through they had no plan B clearly.

I think our offense will be the same but maybe with some more rim running from Robinson and Queta. More offensive boards but think that may lead to more 3s actually.

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #11 on: Today at 08:57:52 AM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27215
  • Tommy Points: 2828
It did feel like this was setting the stage for a Giannis trade and trying to get the fanbase to understand why they wanted to trade JB for him. When that fell through they had no plan B clearly.

I think our offense will be the same but maybe with some more rim running from Robinson and Queta. More offensive boards but think that may lead to more 3s actually.

It did seem for a moment in time that the Celtics were going to get Giannis and that we'd be starting this season with 2 top 5 (top 7) NBA players in the starting lineup.  Of course there'd be naysayers claiming that our team's future is reliant on an injury prone Giannis. But other chips probably would have fallen in our favor had they got Giannis and we'd undoubtedly be one of the top three favorites to win it all.   

If it is true, something I neither fully believe or dismiss, that Brad could have had GA by sending Hugo or Baylor (or both) - then that was either a colossal mistake, or Brad has some seriously high expectations for these two - or one of them.

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #12 on: Today at 09:34:20 AM »

Online Indocelts

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2094
  • Tommy Points: 382
JT is more than capable of attacking. He averaged 8.5 FT attempts per game one season. That is more than JB has ever done.
JT's definitely more than capable of doing it.  he just doesn't do it nearly enough.

JB, as everyone who watches the games has seen, does not get a fair whistle from the refs so that's part of the reason his FT rate isn't higher.  if he got an equitable whistle to what other all-stars get, he'd easily get 2 more trips to the line for 4 more FT attempts and that's being conservative.

JT took 10 3PTAs per game. If he can convert 5 of those shots into driving to the rim I would be a happy Celtics fans.

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #13 on: Today at 09:38:40 AM »

Online Indocelts

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2094
  • Tommy Points: 382
Or maybe, demand from the coach that the players need to attack the rim more (maybe 75% of the time) and stop settling for 3s 24/7.
a change in coaching philosophy (or better yet, a change in the coach) should have been the approach this offseason before giving away our second best player

Any player should be playing to his strength, not to his weakness. Joe sometimes did the opposite with his rigid 3pt heavy system. This was sheer stupidity.

Re: Impact at the Rim
« Reply #14 on: Today at 11:07:18 AM »

Offline byennie

  • Webmaster
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2671
  • Tommy Points: 3053
Or maybe, demand from the coach that the players need to attack the rim more (maybe 75% of the time) and stop settling for 3s 24/7.
a change in coaching philosophy (or better yet, a change in the coach) should have been the approach this offseason before giving away our second best player

Any player should be playing to his strength, not to his weakness. Joe sometimes did the opposite with his rigid 3pt heavy system. This was sheer stupidity.

I think it's fine for the team to shoot a lot of 3s - that's the modern NBA. But to this point, having certain guys break down the defense is what GETS you good looks. And there will be certain times where you need that ability to keep the defense honest, or exploit a matchup.

My wish would be to see JT and Pritchard going to the rim more. JT completely collapses the defense when he does, and with Queta / Robinson a lot of his misses will get cleaned up. Meanwhile I don't mind White, Hauser, Hugo or Baylor spotting up from 3 for open looks. Pritchard is an excellent finisher, he can't live at the rim due to his size but he can get there consistently and plays well above his size finishing the play.