Author Topic: Why haven't we addressed coaching?  (Read 480 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Why haven't we addressed coaching?
« on: Yesterday at 11:42:18 AM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 64917
  • Tommy Points: -25353
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I don't understand how anybody in management has watched our team in the playoffs and said "Our biggest problem?  Jaylen Brown".  For whatever JB's faults, the reason we have lost to an underdog in 3 out of 4 seasons has little to do with JB, or his salary slot.

The biggest reasons we lost against the 76ers were 1) being unprepared, 2) not making adjustments either in-game or between games.  So, we saw the same offensive and defensive schemes exploited over and over again.   Brad addressed Queta's inability to stay on the floor by adding Robinson, but he's done little to answer why so many players showed a steep regression in the postseason.

The team clearly needs a fresh set of eyes on the bench.  Since the title team Charles Lee has left.  JVG has left.  The team's coaching is poorer than it was.

Joe isn't getting replaced, but why not supplement the bench?  It doesn't impact the salary cap, so why not invest in improving the team where we can?
I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

Re: Why haven't we addressed coaching?
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 08:47:12 PM »

Offline Silas

  • 2020 CelticsStrong Draft Guru
  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13919
  • Tommy Points: 2354
I don't understand how anybody in management has watched our team in the playoffs and said "Our biggest problem?  Jaylen Brown".  For whatever JB's faults, the reason we have lost to an underdog in 3 out of 4 seasons has little to do with JB, or his salary slot.

The biggest reasons we lost against the 76ers were 1) being unprepared, 2) not making adjustments either in-game or between games.  So, we saw the same offensive and defensive schemes exploited over and over again.   Brad addressed Queta's inability to stay on the floor by adding Robinson, but he's done little to answer why so many players showed a steep regression in the postseason.

The team clearly needs a fresh set of eyes on the bench.  Since the title team Charles Lee has left.  JVG has left.  The team's coaching is poorer than it was.

Joe isn't getting replaced, but why not supplement the bench?  It doesn't impact the salary cap, so why not invest in improving the team where we can?

I agree that Joe and his coaching staff made mistakes, however the reason the Cs lost the series to Philly was they had a terrible shooting series.  regular season FG% - 46.7%   3pt% - 36.7%
 
1st loss....FG%-39% (-7.7)     3pt%-26%  (-10.7)
2nd loss....FG%-40% (-6.7)    3pt%-28%  (-8.7)
3rd loss.... FG%- 44% (-2.7)   3pt%-33%  (-3.7)
4th loss.....FG%- 40% (-6.7)   3pt%-27%  (-9.7)

You need to make baskets to win.
I've lived through some terrible things in my life, some of which actually happened.   -  Mark Twain

Re: Why haven't we addressed coaching?
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 09:04:10 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 64917
  • Tommy Points: -25353
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I don't understand how anybody in management has watched our team in the playoffs and said "Our biggest problem?  Jaylen Brown".  For whatever JB's faults, the reason we have lost to an underdog in 3 out of 4 seasons has little to do with JB, or his salary slot.

The biggest reasons we lost against the 76ers were 1) being unprepared, 2) not making adjustments either in-game or between games.  So, we saw the same offensive and defensive schemes exploited over and over again.   Brad addressed Queta's inability to stay on the floor by adding Robinson, but he's done little to answer why so many players showed a steep regression in the postseason.

The team clearly needs a fresh set of eyes on the bench.  Since the title team Charles Lee has left.  JVG has left.  The team's coaching is poorer than it was.

Joe isn't getting replaced, but why not supplement the bench?  It doesn't impact the salary cap, so why not invest in improving the team where we can?

I agree that Joe and his coaching staff made mistakes, however the reason the Cs lost the series to Philly was they had a terrible shooting series.  regular season FG% - 46.7%   3pt% - 36.7%
 
1st loss....FG%-39% (-7.7)     3pt%-26%  (-10.7)
2nd loss....FG%-40% (-6.7)    3pt%-28%  (-8.7)
3rd loss.... FG%- 44% (-2.7)   3pt%-33%  (-3.7)
4th loss.....FG%- 40% (-6.7)   3pt%-27%  (-9.7)

You need to make baskets to win.

It's all connected, though.  Our offense suffered in part because the coaching staff couldn't get good looks.  Also, key players were in foul trouble because our defensive schemes weren't working.
I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

Re: Why haven't we addressed coaching?
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 10:15:50 PM »

Online SparzWizard

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20309
  • Tommy Points: 1186
Maybe settle less on 3s and attack the rim more.

Oh and don't wait until Game 7 to change your starting lineup. Man were the 76ers licking their chops against Baylor, Luka, and Ron Harper Jr.


#FireJoe
#JokeMazulla 2026
#JTJB (Just Trade Jaylen Brown) - Mission Accomplished 2026
I am the Master of Panic.

Re: Why haven't we addressed coaching?
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 10:42:04 PM »

Offline Jiri Welsch

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3342
  • Tommy Points: 397
To answer your question, Roy, I really am unsure. I think they should be adding new blood to the coaching staff most seasons. Especially after these last two.

I disagree with the stand pat mindset Brad has here.

Re: Why haven't we addressed coaching?
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 10:43:21 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15706
  • Tommy Points: 1839
Mitch Johnson is an average at best coach and the Spurs were in the Finals. The coaching has very little to do with it. Sam Cassell is still part of the staff, they are fine.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:49:01 PM by Goldstar88 »
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Why haven't we addressed coaching?
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 11:06:50 PM »

Offline Jiri Welsch

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3342
  • Tommy Points: 397
Mitch Johnson is an average at best coach and the Spurs were in the Finals. The coaching has very little to do with it. Sam Cassell is still part of the staff, they are fine.

The Spurs just hired Billy Donovan as a lead assistant, so they probably don?t agree entirely with that assessment.

Re: Why haven't we addressed coaching?
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 11:44:31 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15706
  • Tommy Points: 1839
Mitch Johnson is an average at best coach and the Spurs were in the Finals. The coaching has very little to do with it. Sam Cassell is still part of the staff, they are fine.

The Spurs just hired Billy Donovan as a lead assistant, so they probably don?t agree entirely with that assessment.

If Billy Donovan was lead assistant, do you think the Spurs beat the Knicks?
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.