Author Topic: Brad Stevens Criticism Thread  (Read 1080 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Brad Stevens Criticism Thread
« Reply #15 on: Today at 12:46:26 AM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8897
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Not defending Brad.  But I did find this the most balanced take on the analytics arguments I have seen.  I highly recommend the read.

https://sports.yahoo.com/nba/article/did-the-celtics-give-away-jaylen-brown-why-analytics-dont-see-phillys-new-star-as-elite-of-elite-004011270.html?

Re: Brad Stevens Criticism Thread
« Reply #16 on: Today at 01:14:45 AM »

Online ozgod

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19998
  • Tommy Points: 1633
I'm reluctant to write him off on the basis of his entire body of work. However sports fans have short memories, and this one trade, viewed negatively, will probably overshadow everything he has done for the franchise so far. Nobody cares about past championships, they care about the here and now.

My thoughts are that I'm reluctant to pass overall judgement on him without knowing the full story. He hasn't even had a chance to explain himself. I feel there's got to be more to this than what's being reported. On its own merits it would appear to be a lopsided trade, trading an All-NBA, All-Star, two way wing who was 2024 Finals MVP and was 6th in MVP voting this season for a guy who by popular consensus had one of the worst contracts in the NBA. And Philly only had to give up two firsts and two seconds to get rid of his contract.

The only way this would make sense is if it is one part of a bigger set of moves that lead to us being a net better team overall. Then you might be able to accept why Stevens appeared to give up a lot for not very much in return. Even taking to account Jaylen's advanced metrics not being great (I posted Jaylen's on/off over his career vs JT and PG13's in this thread he still was an important part of winning a championship, he won Finals MVP and he finished 6th in MVP voting due to his overall production and impact.

Speculating on what we don't know, either of these things could be true, which would be a way of defending (clutching at straws) this decision:

a) there has been a relationship breakdown, either between Jaylen and the organization, or Jaylen and Tatum, that they deemed to be beyond repair, and that could affect the harmony of the locker room. Why this happened after 10 years, who knows. But they do happen. You'd have to think that Jaylen probably knew this was coming, he wouldn't have been blindsided by it.

b) it's about the money. Jaylen is eligible for an extension this year, it would have been at minimum a 2 year $140m extension ($70m AAV) starting in 2029-30, or up to a five year extension at $325m ($65m AAV) if he had reached free agency. It's possible that Brad was thinking ahead and didn't think Jaylen was worth paying that extension for so he moved him now, for a guy who, while being overpaid for his production, will come off the books end of next season.

On its own merits, looking at it in a vacuum, it looks like he got screwed - he gave up an All-NBA asset for a washed up has been. So I'm looking forward to his justification for it, I feel he needs ot do that to settle the fanbase down and help us understand his reasoning.
Any odd typos are because I suck at typing on an iPhone :D


Re: Brad Stevens Criticism Thread
« Reply #17 on: Today at 01:58:51 AM »

Offline johnnygreen

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2482
  • Tommy Points: 311
I can understand wanting to include Brown in the Giannis trade. However, why bother trading Brown for such a bad return, especially when Brown still had 3 years remaining on his contract and that 2 year extension didn't need to be offered.

What happened behind the scenes that we don't know about?

Why has Tatum been so quiet, especially when the league was essentially trashing Brown?

All I know is something stinks and I want to know why.

Re: Brad Stevens Criticism Thread
« Reply #18 on: Today at 02:12:10 AM »

Offline johnnygreen

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2482
  • Tommy Points: 311
BTW, I don't blame the new ownership for this. Unfortunately, this all goes back to Wyc. He was the one who gave out all these unnecessary contract extensions (Brown, Holiday, Porzingis, White) before he decided to sell the team. The ramifications of those signings didn't matter to Wyc because he wouldn't be on the hook.

As for Brad Stevens, I have to assume his hands were tied and the league knew it. This is the same guy that built a championship team a few years ago. Then tore it down and somehow managed to get under the apron this past trade deadline. How can that same GM make this Brown trade. Something doesn't add up.

Re: Brad Stevens Criticism Thread
« Reply #19 on: Today at 05:43:08 AM »

Offline goCeltics

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1934
  • Tommy Points: 71

I believe he panicked when he lost Portland as a bidder, and they got Morant instead. He should have gone forward with Brown and waited till the trade deadline; the off-season is when I think you are going to get the least value, as teams have more roster flexibility. It was a total panic move, and nobody can tell me otherwise, when he no reason to when he was still under contract

Re: Brad Stevens Criticism Thread
« Reply #20 on: Today at 06:53:49 AM »

Online Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20583
  • Tommy Points: 1359
I believe he was told not to extend Brown by ownership, Brown did not like this and it forced his hand.   I do not buy any of the panic nonsense.   This was a business decision, not a basketball one, it came from the top.