Author Topic: Big L: Queta/Nikola/Tatum/Brown/White  (Read 800 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Big L: Queta/Nikola/Tatum/Brown/White
« on: Today at 05:46:05 AM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8710
  • Tommy Points: 1142

 With Simons gone the roster is unbalanced if you start White and Prichard together. Or you can Start Queta and Tatum in the frontcourt with Brown, White, Prichard and that at least gives a big scorer off the bench in Nikola.

 Moving Prichard to the bench again would really help.the team of we can't get another guard that can score. While I love Hauser, Baylor,  Hugo, and Jordan, none of those guys can create offense.

Re: Big L: Queta/Nikola/Tatum/Brown/White
« Reply #1 on: Today at 05:58:14 AM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8939
  • Tommy Points: 293
Against the bigger teams that's an option.

I'd like starters to be
White, Walsh, JB, JT, Queta

that creates the "bench bombers"
PP, Hauser, Vuc

the defense options off bench would be Gonzo and Minott.

Re: Big L: Queta/Nikola/Tatum/Brown/White
« Reply #2 on: Today at 07:06:17 AM »

Offline michigan adam

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 261
  • Tommy Points: 21

 With Simons gone the roster is unbalanced if you start White and Prichard together. Or you can Start Queta and Tatum in the frontcourt with Brown, White, Prichard and that at least gives a big scorer off the bench in Nikola.

 Moving Prichard to the bench again would really help.the team of we can't get another guard that can score. While I love Hauser, Baylor,  Hugo, and Jordan, none of those guys can create offense.

I think the whole "bench scorer" idea is way overplayed. Rarely are at least one of Jt, or Brown not on the floor.  When they are not white or pp usually are, but they are surely a step down.  The point is to have 2 capable scorers on the floor at all times whether they start or come off the bench. The more options you have on the bench the longer you can keep the starters on the floor together, but that's not really how the C's play.  I think part of that is having two "alpha" players. They each need time on the floor without the other two run the show. It works for the team. Vuc is a different scorer than AS but not really a step down. He is not a create your own shot type of player, but once JT comes back we really dont need another of those. We basically have 4 of those already when you add white and PP. Vuc is a great secondary pick and roll or hit the open shot type of scorer. He stretches the floor like the C's love and give the slashers more room to work. A good fit for this team the trade just made sense on many levels.

Re: Big L: Queta/Nikola/Tatum/Brown/White
« Reply #3 on: Today at 08:23:53 AM »

Online Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32031
  • Tommy Points: 3863
  • Yup

 With Simons gone the roster is unbalanced if you start White and Prichard together. Or you can Start Queta and Tatum in the frontcourt with Brown, White, Prichard and that at least gives a big scorer off the bench in Nikola.

 Moving Prichard to the bench again would really help.the team of we can't get another guard that can score. While I love Hauser, Baylor,  Hugo, and Jordan, none of those guys can create offense.

I think the whole "bench scorer" idea is way overplayed. Rarely are at least one of Jt, or Brown not on the floor.  When they are not white or pp usually are, but they are surely a step down.  The point is to have 2 capable scorers on the floor at all times whether they start or come off the bench. The more options you have on the bench the longer you can keep the starters on the floor together, but that's not really how the C's play.  I think part of that is having two "alpha" players. They each need time on the floor without the other two run the show. It works for the team. Vuc is a different scorer than AS but not really a step down. He is not a create your own shot type of player, but once JT comes back we really dont need another of those. We basically have 4 of those already when you add white and PP. Vuc is a great secondary pick and roll or hit the open shot type of scorer. He stretches the floor like the C's love and give the slashers more room to work. A good fit for this team the trade just made sense on many levels.

Assuming no lengthy injury absences and Tatum?s return is smooth, it?s going to be a lot of fun to see them mix and match.  If Tatum can give them 20-25 minutes of quality play they?re going to be very tough.

I feel a little bad for Garza.  He?s likely going to start seeing some DNP-CDs and he has 100% earned minutes. 
Yup

Re: Big L: Queta/Nikola/Tatum/Brown/White
« Reply #4 on: Today at 09:01:19 AM »

Online Goldstar88

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14296
  • Tommy Points: 1768
Vuc isn?t quick enough to play PF. He should come off the bench.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Big L: Queta/Nikola/Tatum/Brown/White
« Reply #5 on: Today at 09:21:16 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20307
  • Tommy Points: 1347
I think we could use a guard and I hope the deal is expanded to add one.  Chicago has a lot of guards.

I don't trust Shulga or Harper to bring the ball up if something happens to PP or White.

Re: Big L: Queta/Nikola/Tatum/Brown/White
« Reply #6 on: Today at 11:05:56 AM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7851
  • Tommy Points: 770
I'm interested to find out if Vucevic is going to start. It might make more sense to keep Queta in the starting lineup for some rim protection and then bring in Vuc for bench scoring/rebounding. I can imagine them bother playing around 25 mpg like this.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008, 2024

Re: Big L: Queta/Nikola/Tatum/Brown/White
« Reply #7 on: Today at 11:50:48 AM »

Online aefgogreen

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 571
  • Tommy Points: 77
I think we could use a guard and I hope the deal is expanded to add one.  Chicago has a lot of guards.

I don't trust Shulga or Harper to bring the ball up if something happens to PP or White.
Does anyone know what's happening with Michael Conley? I feel like he'd be a perfect fit.

Re: Big L: Queta/Nikola/Tatum/Brown/White
« Reply #8 on: Today at 11:51:55 AM »

Online Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33355
  • Tommy Points: 1750
  • What a Pub Should Be
I think we could use a guard and I hope the deal is expanded to add one.  Chicago has a lot of guards.

I don't trust Shulga or Harper to bring the ball up if something happens to PP or White.
Does anyone know what's happening with Michael Conley? I feel like he'd be a perfect fit.

All signs are pointing to him getting bought out.  Although I don't really think he'd be that great of a fit for the Celtics but he should be available.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Big L: Queta/Nikola/Tatum/Brown/White
« Reply #9 on: Today at 12:42:51 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53640
  • Tommy Points: 2584
I think we could use a guard and I hope the deal is expanded to add one.  Chicago has a lot of guards.

I don't trust Shulga or Harper to bring the ball up if something happens to PP or White.
Does anyone know what's happening with Michael Conley? I feel like he'd be a perfect fit.

All signs are pointing to him getting bought out.  Although I don't really think he'd be that great of a fit for the Celtics but he should be available.

Last year, Conley was a liability as the starting PG for Minnesota.

This year, Conley has been a liability as a backup PG for Minny.

Conley isn't good enough to play regular minutes anymore. At best he is an old head / locker room voice type of player.