Author Topic: Pacers (10-34) at Celtics (26-16) Game #43 1/21/26  (Read 1620 times)

Silas and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Pacers (10-34) at Celtics (26-16) Game #43 1/21/26
« Reply #30 on: Yesterday at 09:57:49 PM »

Offline SCeltic34

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18257
  • Tommy Points: 2369
Well, the Nets just lost by 54 points to NYK and we play them next.  Hopefully a similar result. 

Re: Pacers (10-34) at Celtics (26-16) Game #43 1/21/26
« Reply #31 on: Yesterday at 10:00:25 PM »

Online Silas

  • 2020 CelticsStrong Draft Guru
  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13359
  • Tommy Points: 2259
Cs 23/25 from the foul line and a solid +12 on the boards.  How about Qs 17pts,9rebs and 4blocks.
I've lived through some terrible things in my life, some of which actually happened.   -  Mark Twain

Re: Pacers (10-34) at Celtics (26-16) Game #43 1/21/26
« Reply #32 on: Yesterday at 10:07:43 PM »

Online radiohead

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8003
  • Tommy Points: 1412
The upcoming sked is pretty light, hopefully we rack up some games. TPs all who stayed for the game!

Re: Pacers (10-34) at Celtics (26-16) Game #43 1/21/26
« Reply #33 on: Today at 08:34:33 AM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31991
  • Tommy Points: 3862
  • Yup
Pretty much every time JB stepped on the court last night the Celtics built a big lead back. He was unstoppable. I know the +/- numbers don?t bear it out quite as well (Pritchard was a way better number).  But it was just a feeling as a viewer.  The game was never in doubt, but it seemed to be more of a blowout when JB was off the bench.
Yup

Re: Pacers (10-34) at Celtics (26-16) Game #43 1/21/26
« Reply #34 on: Today at 09:45:17 AM »

Online slamtheking

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33136
  • Tommy Points: 10194
Pretty much every time JB stepped on the court last night the Celtics built a big lead back. He was unstoppable. I know the +/- numbers don?t bear it out quite as well (Pritchard was a way better number).  But it was just a feeling as a viewer.  The game was never in doubt, but it seemed to be more of a blowout when JB was off the bench.
agreed.  the +/- for JB doesn't match up to the eye test of that game.  JB seemed to have a much bigger impact when on the court.