Teams also would not be able to protect picks in the 12 to 15 slots going forward.
What does this mean? Because the way I read it, it's not making any sense.
You can protect picks 1-11, but not 1-12/13/14/15?
If you're drafting in spots 12-15, any protection on traded picks is voided?
If you finished in spots 12-15, you can't make any trades where you protect picks?
I feel like none of these makes sense, so someone help me understand please.
On the proposal as a whole, I think relegation is the most interesting, I really want to see how that plays out, I think that alone could work wonders.
'Going forward' presumes any protections on trades already made (e.g. someone's protected pick in 2027 or whatever) will be grandfathered into the rule, I think.
I also suspect the change to 12-15 protections is there because of the expanded lottery odds detailed before:
16 teams in the lottery.
*3 lottery balls for Teams that do not qualify for the playoffs or play-in tournament but finish 4-10
*2 lottery balls for teams with a bottom-three record (worst possible pick is 12th)
*2 lottery balls for 9th and 10th play-in seeds
*1 lottery ball for the 7th/8th play-in losers
Full disclosure, I'm a little hungover so I might be missing something, but they seem to be trying to disincentivise protecting bottom-of-the-pile picks (which would impact, usually, the better teams that are now eligible for the draft lottery).