Author Topic: NBA Teams Looking Into New Ways To Prevent Teams From Tanking  (Read 41400 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: NBA Teams Looking Into New Ways To Prevent Teams From Tanking
« Reply #45 on: Yesterday at 08:53:25 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 35518
  • Tommy Points: 1632
These are some of the dumbest things I've seen. 

If you want to stop tanking, just fine the owners and do it in very large sums of money.  Tanking will stop immediately.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: NBA Teams Looking Into New Ways To Prevent Teams From Tanking
« Reply #46 on: Yesterday at 09:59:41 PM »

Offline KungPoweChicken

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2107
  • Tommy Points: 229
Impose a tax penalty on teams with consecutive bottom finishes in the standings. There are a lot of creative ways this could be structured.

Re: NBA Teams Looking Into New Ways To Prevent Teams From Tanking
« Reply #47 on: Yesterday at 10:30:21 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53991
  • Tommy Points: 2593
Impose a tax penalty on teams with consecutive bottom finishes in the standings. There are a lot of creative ways this could be structured.

Do something like they do in English soccer where money distribution in the league is (1) 50% of it equally shared (2) 50% based on league standings. On merit.

That will force teams to try to win.

Offline bdm860

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6151
  • Tommy Points: 4625
Quote
Teams also would not be able to protect picks in the 12 to 15 slots going forward.

What does this mean? Because the way I read it, it's not making any sense.

You can protect picks 1-11, but not 1-12/13/14/15?

If you're drafting in spots 12-15, any protection on traded picks is voided?

If you finished in spots 12-15, you can't make any trades where you protect picks?

I feel like none of these makes sense, so someone help me understand please.


On the proposal as a whole, I think relegation is the most interesting, I really want to see how that plays out, I think that alone could work wonders.




After 18 months with their Bigs, the Littles were: 46% less likely to use illegal drugs, 27% less likely to use alcohol, 52% less likely to skip school, 37% less likely to skip a class

Offline Kernewek

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4780
  • Tommy Points: 302
  • International Superstar
Quote
Teams also would not be able to protect picks in the 12 to 15 slots going forward.

What does this mean? Because the way I read it, it's not making any sense.

You can protect picks 1-11, but not 1-12/13/14/15?

If you're drafting in spots 12-15, any protection on traded picks is voided?

If you finished in spots 12-15, you can't make any trades where you protect picks?

I feel like none of these makes sense, so someone help me understand please.


On the proposal as a whole, I think relegation is the most interesting, I really want to see how that plays out, I think that alone could work wonders.
'Going forward' presumes any protections on trades already made (e.g. someone's protected pick in 2027 or whatever) will be grandfathered into the rule, I think.

I also suspect the change to 12-15 protections is there because of the expanded lottery odds detailed before:

16 teams in the lottery.
*3 lottery balls for Teams that do not qualify for the playoffs or play-in tournament but finish 4-10
*2 lottery balls for teams with a bottom-three record (worst possible pick is 12th)
*2 lottery balls for 9th and 10th play-in seeds
*1 lottery ball for the 7th/8th play-in losers

Full disclosure, I'm a little hungover so I might be missing something, but they seem to be trying to disincentivise protecting bottom-of-the-pile picks (which would impact, usually, the better teams that are now eligible for the draft lottery).
"...unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo-realities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms. I do not distrust their motives; I distrust their power. They have a lot of it."