Is this team good enough?

[slamtheking]

Clayton doesn't move the needle much, but the trade is reasonable value.

really?  how so?  rephrase the deal -- say we were offering Simons and a Pick for essentially Queta but paid about 25 mill more a year.  I can't see you saying that was a reasonable value.  Before you go saying that Claxton is better than Q, I'll give you that he is, but not that much better and certainly not 25 million a year better.

Claxton is better than Queta by a fairly significant margin at this point in their careers.  Queta is improving and could one day be as good as Claxton but he isn't there yet.

from what Claxton produced on the court last year and so far this year, he's not significantly better.  At this point, they're both high quality back up centers but not good starting quality.  I don't see Claxton having the room to develop into one whereas Q still could -- particularly at the rate he's improving.  No matter how you rate them, there's no way Claxton is worth that salary in light of what Q is making.

[slamtheking]

Clayton doesn't move the needle much, but the trade is reasonable value.

really?  how so?  rephrase the deal -- say we were offering Simons and a Pick for essentially Queta but paid about 25 mill more a year.  I can't see you saying that was a reasonable value.  Before you go saying that Claxton is better than Q, I'll give you that he is, but not that much better and certainly not 25 million a year better.

Claxton is better than Queta by a fairly significant margin at this point in their careers.  Queta is improving and could one day be as good as Claxton but he isn't there yet.

from what Claxton produced on the court last year and so far this year, he's not significantly better.  At this point, they're both high quality back up centers but not good starting quality.  I don't see Claxton having the room to develop into one whereas Q still could -- particularly at the rate he's improving.  No matter how you rate them, there's no way Claxton is worth that salary in light of what Q is making.

[Who]

Who cares how much money Queta makes?

He signed a contract when he was a borderline NBA player. He has grown into a borderline starting caliber player. He would get a full MLE contract if he entered FA right now. If he maintains this production until the end of the season and entered the FA market in the summer of 2026, he would get $20 million or more.

Nic Claxton is fairly paid at $25 million. He is better than Queta because of his defensive quickness. He can defend the perimeter better than Queta and make quicker rotations. Offensively, they are similar. Rebounding wise Queta is better. Having the two of them together would give the Celtics 48 minutes of quality center play. That is enough to put them back in the title hunt.

[Celtics4ever]

I am fine with Queta being our center.   I think we need to access the need after Tatum returns and my reason, is this did Tatum lose lateral speed and ability to cover wings.   If so going forward he is a Power forward/stretch four.   Brown is our SG.   If we make a move I would like to see it for a SF/PF combo guy to cover the bases with Tatum's return.   Or you could go SG and move Brown to SF.

Claxton is better than Queta by a fairly significant margin at this point in their careers.  Queta is improving and could one day be as good as Claxton but he isn't there yet. 

Queta is a better value than Claxton in terms of cost for value.  I do not think it is as significant as you present.

Some game stats

https://www.landofbasketball.com/box_scores/2025/1121BKNBOS.htm

https://www.landofbasketball.com/box_scores/2025/1118BOSBKN.htm

Tied  for blocks 25 each

https://www.landofbasketball.com/year_by_year_stats/2025_2026_leaders_blocks_tot_rs.htm

Queta is 23rd is rebounds per game at  8.5 to 7.5 for Claxton
Claxton scores 13.5 Points per game to Neemi  9.8 PPG

https://www.espn.com/nba/player/_/id/4278067/nic-claxton

https://www.espn.com/nba/player/_/id/4397424/neemias-queta

Defensive Rating

Neemias Queta has a defensive rating of 111.4 this season.   https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/neemias-queta-defensive-rating-this-year
Nic Claxton has a defensive rating of 120.1 this season.  https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nic-claxton-defensive-rating

NET rating ( These rankings are updated daily and represent the Net Points metric, which gives offensive and defensive credit to players corresponding to points added to the team point differential.)

Neemi is a 29th in the league   and Claxton is 423th, now I realize this is an analytic made up stat.

https://espnanalytics.com/nba-net-pts

Claxton has better defensive range and mobility and can switch better than Neemi.  Neemi is bigger and can body people better.  Both are 26 years old. 

Claxton is a better passer and ball mover  4 APG vs. 1.6 APG

FG 54.9 for Claxton and 64.5 for Neemias

But I am fine with Neemias.