Author Topic: Celtics 2025-26 Regular Season Discussion  (Read 27840 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics 2025-26 Regular Season Discussion
« Reply #120 on: December 10, 2025, 03:48:23 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15298
  • Tommy Points: 1038
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
So, why do we think Chris Boucher isn't playing at all? He seems to have all of the qualities a player would need to fit into the system. He's got length, he can shoot, he's always been known as a hustle guy, and we specifically went out and signed him after dumping Niang.

Perhaps it's just a down year for him or perhaps Joe he just doesn't fit what Joe wants to do, but it seemed like he would be a pretty integral part of the rotation coming into the season and now he literally never plays. It was thought at the beginning of the offseason that he might get considerably more than the minimum and that we were lucky to get him.

For his sake, I hope we are able to trade him to a more auspicious situation. I imagine he thought by signing to a team with very little big depth, he would be getting a lot more playing time. I know he has not produced in his on-court minutes, but those minutes have been very few and far between.

Guys ahead of him are playing much better.  Also, his shoot has looked terrible when he has been out there.  Who's minutes are you going to cut to get Boucher in there?
So basically you are saying that Luka Garza is playing better than Boucher. That is not clear to me with Boucher?s limited minutes.

Re: Celtics 2025-26 Regular Season Discussion
« Reply #121 on: December 10, 2025, 03:56:50 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8077
  • Tommy Points: 1043
So, why do we think Chris Boucher isn't playing at all? He seems to have all of the qualities a player would need to fit into the system. He's got length, he can shoot, he's always been known as a hustle guy, and we specifically went out and signed him after dumping Niang.

Perhaps it's just a down year for him or perhaps Joe he just doesn't fit what Joe wants to do, but it seemed like he would be a pretty integral part of the rotation coming into the season and now he literally never plays. It was thought at the beginning of the offseason that he might get considerably more than the minimum and that we were lucky to get him.

For his sake, I hope we are able to trade him to a more auspicious situation. I imagine he thought by signing to a team with very little big depth, he would be getting a lot more playing time. I know he has not produced in his on-court minutes, but those minutes have been very few and far between.

Guys ahead of him are playing much better.  Also, his shoot has looked terrible when he has been out there.  Who's minutes are you going to cut to get Boucher in there?
So basically you are saying that Luka Garza is playing better than Boucher. That is not clear to me with Boucher?s limited minutes.

Neither Garza or Boucher are getting minutes at this point, so there is nothing to debate.  In Boucher?s limited minutes, he had done nothing on the offensive glass and shot deplorably.  He may better at defense than Garza, but his offense was atrocious, and defensively he is more suited at the 4.  There will unfortunately be an extended injury sometime sooner or later, and maybe Boucher will get minutes then.  I was excited by his summer signing, but maybe there was a reason he was available into August.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2025, 04:02:16 PM by Celtics2021 »

Re: Celtics 2025-26 Regular Season Discussion
« Reply #122 on: December 10, 2025, 04:45:52 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13826
  • Tommy Points: 2069
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
So, why do we think Chris Boucher isn't playing at all? He seems to have all of the qualities a player would need to fit into the system. He's got length, he can shoot, he's always been known as a hustle guy, and we specifically went out and signed him after dumping Niang.

Perhaps it's just a down year for him or perhaps Joe he just doesn't fit what Joe wants to do, but it seemed like he would be a pretty integral part of the rotation coming into the season and now he literally never plays. It was thought at the beginning of the offseason that he might get considerably more than the minimum and that we were lucky to get him.

For his sake, I hope we are able to trade him to a more auspicious situation. I imagine he thought by signing to a team with very little big depth, he would be getting a lot more playing time. I know he has not produced in his on-court minutes, but those minutes have been very few and far between.

Guys ahead of him are playing much better.  Also, his shoot has looked terrible when he has been out there.  Who's minutes are you going to cut to get Boucher in there?
So basically you are saying that Luka Garza is playing better than Boucher. That is not clear to me with Boucher?s limited minutes.

Neither Garza or Boucher are getting minutes at this point, so there is nothing to debate.  In Boucher?s limited minutes, he had done nothing on the offensive glass and shot deplorably.  He may better at defense than Garza, but his offense was atrocious, and defensively he is more suited at the 4.  There will unfortunately be an extended injury sometime sooner or later, and maybe Boucher will get minutes then.  I was excited by his summer signing, but maybe there was a reason he was available into August.

Yeah, I'm not pushing for Boucher to get more minutes, just find it interesting that he is getting none due to his player profile. Also find it interesting that Amari Williams somehow jumped all of Tillman, Boucher, and Garza when he is quite limited himself. I suppose he has more potential and it's good to get him minutes, but it's wild that we only have one official big and the other three are literally the last three guys on the bench.

On another note, it's awesome that Minott has been able to fill in those big minutes when called upon. That's why I think if we do pursue another big, it's going to be somebody physical and mobile like Queta/Minott. He doesn't have to be expensive, just has to have certain qualities where Joe will actually play him.

Re: Celtics 2025-26 Regular Season Discussion
« Reply #123 on: Today at 05:12:58 AM »

Offline keevsnick

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6982
  • Tommy Points: 680
Just wanted to throw out there some milestones for Jaylen Brown scoring wise coming up this season. He has scored 12,169 points in his career which is currently 14th all time for the Celtics. He could pass the following players this year on the Celtics all-time list.

13- Tom Heinsohn: 12,194.
-Brown needs 26 points to pass, probably does so next game.

12- Bill Sharman: 12,287
-Brown needs 119 points to pass, probably does so in next 4-5 games.

11- Jo Jo White: 13,188
-Brown needs 1020 points to pass. At current scoring rate would take roughly 35-36 more games played.

10- Dave Cowens: 13,192
-Brown needs 1024 points to pass. At current scoring rate would take roughly 35-36 more games played. 

If he stays healthy this year and keeps up close to his current pace, he'll likely finish the year 10th all time in Celtics scoring right behind Jayson Tatum who is #9 at 13,789 career points.

Even if Tatum doesn't play Brown probably can't catch him this year. Even if he played all 56 remaining games and scored at a 29 ppg rate he'd only Barely pass Tatum.

Re: Celtics 2025-26 Regular Season Discussion
« Reply #124 on: Today at 08:06:20 AM »

Offline boscel33

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2919
  • Tommy Points: 174
Interesting Article: 

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/25324263-1-trade-every-nba-team-would-make-if-deadline-was-today

Under the C's section, it has us sending Anfernee Simons, Josh Minott, 2026 second-round pick (via DET, MIL or ORL) and 2031 first-round pick (top-3 protected) to the Milwaukee Bucks for Myles Turner.

But under the Houston section, it has them sending us Tari Eason, Jae'Sean Tate and a 2029 first-round pick (via DAL or PHO) to the Boston Celtics for Payton Pritchard.

"There's sharks and minnows in this world. If you don't know which you are, you ain't a shark."

Re: Celtics 2025-26 Regular Season Discussion
« Reply #125 on: Today at 08:49:16 AM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8077
  • Tommy Points: 1043
Interesting Article: 

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/25324263-1-trade-every-nba-team-would-make-if-deadline-was-today

Under the C's section, it has us sending Anfernee Simons, Josh Minott, 2026 second-round pick (via DET, MIL or ORL) and 2031 first-round pick (top-3 protected) to the Milwaukee Bucks for Myles Turner.

But under the Houston section, it has them sending us Tari Eason, Jae'Sean Tate and a 2029 first-round pick (via DAL or PHO) to the Boston Celtics for Payton Pritchard.

I would absolutely take the best of Houston?s 2029 picks for Pritchard, especially if it came with Eason.

Re: Celtics 2025-26 Regular Season Discussion
« Reply #126 on: Today at 08:54:11 AM »

Online slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32880
  • Tommy Points: 10156
Interesting Article: 

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/25324263-1-trade-every-nba-team-would-make-if-deadline-was-today

Under the C's section, it has us sending Anfernee Simons, Josh Minott, 2026 second-round pick (via DET, MIL or ORL) and 2031 first-round pick (top-3 protected) to the Milwaukee Bucks for Myles Turner.

But under the Houston section, it has them sending us Tari Eason, Jae'Sean Tate and a 2029 first-round pick (via DAL or PHO) to the Boston Celtics for Payton Pritchard.

I would absolutely take the best of Houston?s 2029 picks for Pritchard, especially if it came with Eason.
seems a bit much for Turner considering his contract and lesser production this season.  scrap the first round and that would be more palatable.

The PP trade is interesting with that pick.  would be a real setback this year without PP's shooting.

Re: Celtics 2025-26 Regular Season Discussion
« Reply #127 on: Today at 09:11:00 AM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31912
  • Tommy Points: 3852
  • Yup
Just wanted to throw out there some milestones for Jaylen Brown scoring wise coming up this season. He has scored 12,169 points in his career which is currently 14th all time for the Celtics. He could pass the following players this year on the Celtics all-time list.

13- Tom Heinsohn: 12,194.
-Brown needs 26 points to pass, probably does so next game.

12- Bill Sharman: 12,287
-Brown needs 119 points to pass, probably does so in next 4-5 games.

11- Jo Jo White: 13,188
-Brown needs 1020 points to pass. At current scoring rate would take roughly 35-36 more games played.

10- Dave Cowens: 13,192
-Brown needs 1024 points to pass. At current scoring rate would take roughly 35-36 more games played. 

If he stays healthy this year and keeps up close to his current pace, he'll likely finish the year 10th all time in Celtics scoring right behind Jayson Tatum who is #9 at 13,789 career points.

Even if Tatum doesn't play Brown probably can't catch him this year. Even if he played all 56 remaining games and scored at a 29 ppg rate he'd only Barely pass Tatum.

I?m sure there?s an a web site that can do it, but it would be interesting to see a timeline/line chart comparing Tatum and Brown?s career point totals. Without looking, given Brown?s one year head start, I?d guess Tatum passed him in his 3rd or 4th season.
Yup

Re: Celtics 2025-26 Regular Season Discussion
« Reply #128 on: Today at 10:07:22 AM »

Online Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33213
  • Tommy Points: 1745
  • What a Pub Should Be
Just wanted to throw out there some milestones for Jaylen Brown scoring wise coming up this season. He has scored 12,169 points in his career which is currently 14th all time for the Celtics. He could pass the following players this year on the Celtics all-time list.

13- Tom Heinsohn: 12,194.
-Brown needs 26 points to pass, probably does so next game.

12- Bill Sharman: 12,287
-Brown needs 119 points to pass, probably does so in next 4-5 games.

11- Jo Jo White: 13,188
-Brown needs 1020 points to pass. At current scoring rate would take roughly 35-36 more games played.

10- Dave Cowens: 13,192
-Brown needs 1024 points to pass. At current scoring rate would take roughly 35-36 more games played. 

If he stays healthy this year and keeps up close to his current pace, he'll likely finish the year 10th all time in Celtics scoring right behind Jayson Tatum who is #9 at 13,789 career points.

Even if Tatum doesn't play Brown probably can't catch him this year. Even if he played all 56 remaining games and scored at a 29 ppg rate he'd only Barely pass Tatum.

I?m sure there?s an a web site that can do it, but it would be interesting to see a timeline/line chart comparing Tatum and Brown?s career point totals. Without looking, given Brown?s one year head start, I?d guess Tatum passed him in his 3rd or 4th season.

Year 3.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Celtics 2025-26 Regular Season Discussion
« Reply #129 on: Today at 11:15:41 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20258
  • Tommy Points: 1341
Brown has had to focus on guarding more elite players in the past, which takes energy and effort and this can hurt scoring amounts.

Quote
But under the Houston section, it has them sending us Tari Eason, Jae'Sean Tate and a 2029 first-round pick (via DAL or PHO) to the Boston Celtics for Payton Pritchard.

Eason would be a good pickup and insurance against Tatum being only able to play PF when he gets back.    Eason can d up well. 

I like the pick but our guard rotation would lose dicey after this trade.  Derrick White and Brown are so so ballhandlers, Simons might get dealt as well.  Pritchard is our best ball handler and I am pretty certain Max Shulga is not up to the task.  Shooting would suffer

Jae'Sean Tate is a short forward at 6'4".  He is a great effort guy but a classic tweener.  We already have Walsh and Minot who can fill this role.  I would rather have Aaron Holiday but cap wise he is a smidgen more expensive.
« Last Edit: Today at 11:32:53 AM by Celtics4ever »