Should Jordan Walsh make the roster?

[slamtheking]

I?d take Walshy over Baylor. Least Jordan can play defense. He shot the 3 ball reasonably well last year in the G-League and he?s still young.

does he though?  not any better than Baylor based on yesterday's game.

Have you watched more than one game?

have you?  oh that's right, you think Joe's a great coach.

[Goldstar88]

I?d take Walshy over Baylor. Least Jordan can play defense. He shot the 3 ball reasonably well last year in the G-League and he?s still young.

does he though?  not any better than Baylor based on yesterday's game.

Have you watched more than one game?

have you?  oh that's right, you think Joe's a great coach.

He?s good enough! 

[Neurotic Guy]

I think it's pretty significant that Baylor is 25 and Jordan is 21.  Neither has impressed but given that there is at least some dispute over who has performed better, the edge regarding which to keep (if it was a choice) has to go to Walsh IMO. 

[dannyboy35]

  I think it was a good point that Schierman has been playing like it?s his 3 that will earn him a spot when that?s only true to a degree. He has the potential to be able to put a few dribbles down unlike Hauser so we envisioned him to maybe be able to create just a bit . Nothing crazy but just use the shot as a threat, get a step , 1 or two dribbles and pass and keep the d trying to catch up. He hasn?t done that. I still THINK he can . But I could be wrong and that Carson Edward?s comparison would maybe be a good one

[mobilija]

Unless there is a better developmental player you can get in place of him, what?s the point in getting rid of him? This is THE year for players on the NBA edge in a Celtics uniform to show they can grow and that they belong in the league. The organization has invested some in him, might as well see that through. Personally I still something there from the 21 year old. If the game slows down for him and he can develop a bit more touch on his passing and shooting he has value.

 I?m with Who. I like him better than Baylor. Walsh?s classic 3 and D potential is more useful than Baylor?s potential microwave role. In fact I?m growing to hate Baylors game. He plays like he?s an Alpha but he?s so inconsistent and unathletic that it?s a detriment. He shows flashy promise but it?s fools gold. I hated playing with guys like him, make an occasional highlight play and therefore have the ball in his hands but the overall product is inefficient and takes away from the players around him.

[Goldstar88]

I think it's pretty significant that Baylor is 25 and Jordan is 21.  Neither has impressed but given that there is at least some dispute over who has performed better, the edge regarding which to keep (if it was a choice) has to go to Walsh IMO.

Completely agree. Walsh has more upside.