Kenny Atkinson -- "we won 3 out of 3 or at least 2 out of 3 analytically in expected score"
He continued to say "if you believe in process" essentially you should be happy with how things have gone. If "you are only outcome based" obviously it is bad but analyitcally they have played well and outplayed than NYK.
Essentially it is just bad luck that CLE is down 0-3.
Atkinson essentially is saying that game plans have been right and the "expected score" analytics show that. That CLE should be ahead in this series. That they are doing the right things. They just haven't gotten the expected result. But you keep doing the same things because over time that will even out and you will get those results.
Analytically that does not calculate to winning playoff games. You're down 0-3 and no team in NBA history has ever come back up from that deficit to win a series. New York adjusted each game or the Cavs made no adjustments and NYK was able to capitalize on them.
Take your analytics and throw it in the trash, Atkinson! This series looks to be over in 4
I don't think that Cleveland will win this series, but it is improbable, rather than impossible. That is to say, at some point, there will be a 'first team to ever come back from 0-3 in the playoffs'.
I also think Atkinson basically has to say that; it certainly makes a more persuasive argument for his continued employment than 'we are playing the right way according to our ideas, but we are losing to a team with better ideas'.
-----
That SGA clip (the phantom foul from D'Aaron Fox) that is making the rounds today is equally hilarious and infuriating. Have seen a few people say that, upon review, players should be assessed with a technical for flopping, which I find quite appealing. Even football/soccer, which is largely viewed as the progenitor of the practice, has started to crack down on it more effectively than the NBA has in recent years.