I haven't seen Perk's negative Celtics takes on ESPN as I don't watch much ESPN and avoid pregame/halftime/postgame shows. I liked watching him on the local broadcast - I thought he was OK; entertaining. I don't really care that much if he has some negative Celtics takes. Lord knows, there are plenty of negative Celtics takes from our brothers and sisters on CStrong. Actually, probably worse on CStrong given that I doubt Perk has called players/coaches morons, idiots, metnally weak, incompetent, etc. Perk is paid to spark interest and if he's doing that, what's the harm? The article didn't say Perk was banned just a suggestion - offered by Scal - that Perk might not be as welcome as others. No big deal.