Bill Simmons reported that Giannis Antetokounmpo was ready to approve a trade to the Boston Celtics, but the deal fell apart over a contract extension. Simmons stated that Boston refused to give Giannis a three-year max extension worth 35% of the cap, only offering a two-year deal worth 30%. Because they couldn't agree on the terms, Giannis greenlit a trade to the Miami Heat instead, and Boston ultimately pivoted to trade Jaylen Brown for Paul George.
Celticsblog had another report saying BOS were willing to pay Giannis the 35% and this wasn't the reason the trade fell through.
However, a league source told CelticsBlog that Giannis Antetokounmpo?s looming extension was not a factor in why the Celtics didn?t land him, and that they were prepared to offer him the full 3-year, 35% contract extension.
It sounds like GM malpractice if one of the top 5 players in the world want to play for you but you don't want to give him a 3 year extension or trade Hugo Freaking Gonzalez.
Bring out the pitchforks, Brad's gotta go
Jaylen is not a 'top 5 player in the world' by any measure. Not by raw statistics, not by advanced statistics, and not by career accolades. He's a top 10-15 player who put up career best numbers in a year where he had a usage rate of 36.2%.
To put that usage rate in perspective Tatum's career high usage rate was 32.7% in 2022-23 when he averatged 29.3 points, 8.6 rebounds and 4.5 assists.
Over 10 NBA seasons Jaylen Brown has averaged 25+ PPG twice, has made 2 all-NBA teams, has made 5 all-star teams, has a net rating of +0 and a BPM of +0.7
Also I don't know if there is a single human in the NBA who is better at recognising potential in unexpected places then Brad Stevens, so if he WAS that high on Hugo then I would say he's got enough of a track record at this point to deserve the benefit of the doubt.
Remember also that that Brad's job is not to put players on the roster who put up big numbers and get media attention. His job is to put guys on the roster that maximise the team's ability to win games. He probably things a that a guy like Hugo (who can impact winning in a big way, seems highly coachable, and is only making $2.9M a year) is better value then getting locked in to $70M a year 5 years from now for a guy who has a tendancy to create controversy and generate drama.
Here's how I differentiate it.
Brown performed at a top 5-6 level last year, but I think there are 20 guys in the NBA who could potentially do that any given year, if they had the right system, health luck, teammates, etc.
But there are players year in and year out that are more reliably close to the top 5. Their ability overcomes bad systems, health, teammates, etc. Brown is not in that group, or anywhere near that group.
Credit his hard work, skill development, and consistent effort last year. It led to a top 6 season.
But I also think that Philly will have a worse system, worse teammate fit, etc for Brown, which is why I'd predict next season he will be closer to 25-30 in performance.