Probably won't matter much to ownership (money-wise) if they plan on trading Schroeder.
With the lack of minutes for Nesmith, PP, and Hauser when everyone's healthy, I don't think they need to have another 10-day prospect in the mix. I'd be fine with him staying as a deep bench guy.
Without the numbers directly in front of me, I was under the impression that we were over the tax more than Schroder is being paid and less than Juancho is being paid.
Of course we'd all rather trade Juancho for nothing in return, but that isn't going to happen. The next best scenario is dealing Schroder for a couple of 2nds and releasing Parker. I like Parker, but we can't let his salary get in the way of having an easy way to get under the tax. The fact that Ime seemingly would prefer to play me in an NBA game over Parker makes this kind-of an obvious move.
Oh I was under the impression that cutting Parker or keeping Parker won't ultimately make a difference for the tax. And that it really comes down to moving Schroeder and Hernangomez for as little salary as possible at the deadline.
If Parker really is the kicker between getting under the tax or staying above, then I agree he definitely should go.
Re-reading what I wrote, I can see how it may have come as a complete mess. I looked it up and the luxury tax this season is: $136,606,000 and the Cs are currently at $142,925,171.
Schroder makes $5,890,000 and Hernangomez makes $7,012,440. If you subtract Schroder's full salary from the C's payroll, you get: $137,035,171 - which is still above the tax. Subtracting Hernangomez's salary gets you to: $135,912,731 - which, obviously, is below the tax.
Of course if we could trade Juancho and take absolutely nothing back, that would be awesome. He seems like a nice guy, but he has been pretty useless to our team this season. The other option is to trade Schroder - as is being discussed recently in the forums (PTDS) - but you also need to shed a bit more salary, and waiving Parker is the easiest way to get you there.