Just in case anyone thought the bad shooting against Brooklyn was a fluke, Boston just proved otherwise. No, they won't always shoot as badly as they did tonight, but make no mistake—this is a bad-shooting team, as their 20th-ranked TS%, 23rd-ranked FG%, and 24th-ranked eFG% confirm.
I'm sure some fans will focus on the near comeback and be encouraged by that, but I think that's fool's gold. Of course it's good to have the ability to pull off comebacks, and the Cs have done that at times, but comebacks, and even near comebacks, can mask significant problems, and this team has several. Why does Boston tend to start games poorly? Why do these guys often wait until their backs are against the wall before deciding to really get after it? And why do they often play down to their competition?
For the most part, they just got abused by a 4-win team. They just faced a defense ranked No. 27 in opponent FG% (46.9%) and No. 21 in opponent 3PT% (35.6%) and shot a putrid 37% and 29.4%, respectively. And most of that putridness came from Boston's starters—a.k.a. their best players. At one point they were down 24 against the team that came into this game with the fourth-worst winning % in the league.
I guess the Celtics are on the "It Gets Worse Before It Gets Better" plan?