Author Topic: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?  (Read 11864 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #15 on: September 11, 2021, 01:06:23 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13530
  • Tommy Points: 1711
I very well could be and yes, I would say Brown is a better player than Antoine Walker. My comparison is not a perfect match and I hope that I am wrong, but you cannot ignore the similarities and Paul Pierce is better than Jayson Tatum until proven otherwise.
[/b]


Tatum has proven otherwise. I love Pierce, but Tatum’s talent is on another level. I think Jayson is already a better player and he is only 23.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #16 on: September 11, 2021, 01:08:44 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52789
  • Tommy Points: 2568
Well, Antoine used to annoy me with his 3's as much as Smart annoys me now.

I just looked at their career stats from 3:

Antoine:  4.8 attempts per game  1.6 made = 32.5%
Marcus:   4.7 attempts per game  1.5 made = 32%

At least Marcus doesn't wiggle.

I loved the wiggle!

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #17 on: September 11, 2021, 02:22:04 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7022
  • Tommy Points: 468
Yeah, posters are going to push back at the OP but I think this post is completely fair.  And while it’s possible that we have a better supporting cast, Rob is really the only guy that had the opportunity to be nothing more than a JAG.  For all the love that Marcus gets he’s a below average staring PG.  Everyone else is just a guy too.

The supporting cast just not jump out in any other way.  No stars.

The comparison between the two stars also fair.  I think brown ends up better than Antoine (he’s there now) but relatively speaking we’ll see.  Jaylen somewhere between 20-25 and that was Antoine peak too.  Tatum might end up better than PP but he hasn’t reached his height just yet.  And has been said, PP was fantastic at getting to the line.  Tatum needs to get there, and improve playmaking to surpass him.

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #18 on: September 11, 2021, 03:16:17 PM »

Offline tenn_smoothie

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7157
  • Tommy Points: 843
I very well could be and yes, I would say Brown is a better player than Antoine Walker. My comparison is not a perfect match and I hope that I am wrong, but you cannot ignore the similarities and Paul Pierce is better than Jayson Tatum until proven otherwise.
[/b]


Tatum has proven otherwise. I love Pierce, but Tatum’s talent is on another level. I think Jayson is already a better player and he is only 23.

Not until Tatum guts out some significant playoff wins. That's how I measure players.
The Four Celtic Generals:
Russell - Cowens - Bird - Garnett

The Four Celtic Lieutenants:
Cousy - Havlicek - McHale - Pierce

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #19 on: September 11, 2021, 03:25:50 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25538
  • Tommy Points: 2720
Yeah, posters are going to push back at the OP but I think this post is completely fair.  And while it’s possible that we have a better supporting cast, Rob is really the only guy that had the opportunity to be nothing more than a JAG.  For all the love that Marcus gets he’s a below average staring PG.  Everyone else is just a guy too.

The supporting cast just not jump out in any other way.  No stars.

The comparison between the two stars also fair.  I think brown ends up better than Antoine (he’s there now) but relatively speaking we’ll see.  Jaylen somewhere between 20-25 and that was Antoine peak too.  Tatum might end up better than PP but he hasn’t reached his height just yet.  And has been said, PP was fantastic at getting to the line.  Tatum needs to get there, and improve playmaking to surpass him.

One thing we can say about the early 2000s C’s is that they can’t be any better than they were. If Toine and Pierce early 2000s are about equal to the Jays right now - the Jays may surpass them in 2021-22. And that isn’t a pipe dream - they are 23 and 24 and both are on an upward trajectory.

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #20 on: September 11, 2021, 03:37:41 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13530
  • Tommy Points: 1711
I very well could be and yes, I would say Brown is a better player than Antoine Walker. My comparison is not a perfect match and I hope that I am wrong, but you cannot ignore the similarities and Paul Pierce is better than Jayson Tatum until proven otherwise.
[/b]


Tatum has proven otherwise. I love Pierce, but Tatum’s talent is on another level. I think Jayson is already a better player and he is only 23.

Not until Tatum guts out some significant playoff wins. That's how I measure players.

Thought we’re were comparing the players individually. What significant playoff wins did pierce have without two HOF players beside him in KG and Ray Allen?  Tatum dropping  50+ pts on Brooklyn, when the Nets had all 3 of their super stars and willing the C’s to victory was pretty significant, IMO.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #21 on: September 11, 2021, 04:06:00 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7940
  • Tommy Points: 1033
I very well could be and yes, I would say Brown is a better player than Antoine Walker. My comparison is not a perfect match and I hope that I am wrong, but you cannot ignore the similarities and Paul Pierce is better than Jayson Tatum until proven otherwise.
[/b]


Tatum has proven otherwise. I love Pierce, but Tatum’s talent is on another level. I think Jayson is already a better player and he is only 23.

Not until Tatum guts out some significant playoff wins. That's how I measure players.

Thought we’re were comparing the players individually. What significant playoff wins did pierce have without two HOF players beside him in KG and Ray Allen?  Tatum dropping  50+ pts on Brooklyn, when the Nets had all 3 of their super stars and willing the C’s to victory was pretty significant, IMO.

Not to mention this is comparing Tatum to early 2000s Pierce, or at least it’s supposed to be.  Tatum has had more playoff success than early Pierce.

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #22 on: September 11, 2021, 05:04:42 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Yeah, posters are going to push back at the OP but I think this post is completely fair.  And while it’s possible that we have a better supporting cast, Rob is really the only guy that had the opportunity to be nothing more than a JAG.  For all the love that Marcus gets he’s a below average staring PG.  Everyone else is just a guy too.

The supporting cast just not jump out in any other way.  No stars.

The comparison between the two stars also fair.  I think brown ends up better than Antoine (he’s there now) but relatively speaking we’ll see.  Jaylen somewhere between 20-25 and that was Antoine peak too.  Tatum might end up better than PP but he hasn’t reached his height just yet.  And has been said, PP was fantastic at getting to the line.  Tatum needs to get there, and improve playmaking to surpass him.
Pierce was better at getting to the line, but Tatum makes up for that in spades by shooting threes. Pierce over his 5 year All Star run in the early 2000's shot 4.7 threes a game at 34.8%. During Tatum's two All Star years thus far, Jayson is shooting 7.3 threes per game hitting them at 39.4%. Over the next 3 years, I expect both Tatum's FTA and 3PTA will increase at higher shooting percentiles than Pierce.

I love Paul Pierce, but Tatum is a much, much better player at every age you compare them at. If Tatum is a Celtic for life, he probably breaks Havlicek's scoring record.

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #23 on: September 11, 2021, 05:06:07 PM »

Offline 18isGREATERthan72

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 469
  • Tommy Points: 34
I very well could be and yes, I would say Brown is a better player than Antoine Walker. My comparison is not a perfect match and I hope that I am wrong, but you cannot ignore the similarities and Paul Pierce is better than Jayson Tatum until proven otherwise.
[/b]


Tatum has proven otherwise. I love Pierce, but Tatum’s talent is on another level. I think Jayson is already a better player and he is only 23.

Not until Tatum guts out some significant playoff wins. That's how I measure players.

Thought we’re were comparing the players individually. What significant playoff wins did pierce have without two HOF players beside him in KG and Ray Allen?  Tatum dropping  50+ pts on Brooklyn, when the Nets had all 3 of their super stars and willing the C’s to victory was pretty significant, IMO.

Not to mention this is comparing Tatum to early 2000s Pierce, or at least it’s supposed to be.  Tatum has had more playoff success than early Pierce.

Exactly. We're not comparing Pierce's career to Tatum.  In my opinion, Tatum has had a better career year for year than Pierce had had at this point in each of their careers.

If you look at it by age, Tatum is way ahead of Pierce.  Their fourth seasons look pretty similar, but that's ignoring Tatum being two years younger than Pierce in his fourth season.

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #24 on: September 11, 2021, 06:49:38 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Until Tatum can get to the free throw line like Pierce did, im still taking Paul as the better player.  Especially in a playoff game
Tatum averaged nearly 10 free throw attempts a game in the playoff series against Brooklyn. Tatum is also 7% from the FT line over his first 4 years than Pierce was
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #25 on: September 11, 2021, 07:05:58 PM »

Offline ETNCeltics

  • NCE
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2747
  • Tommy Points: 311
Not even close. Tatum is on his way to being a top 5 player in the league, and Brown is a far better player than Antoine Walker.

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #26 on: September 11, 2021, 07:15:35 PM »

Offline ETNCeltics

  • NCE
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2747
  • Tommy Points: 311
I very well could be and yes, I would say Brown is a better player than Antoine Walker. My comparison is not a perfect match and I hope that I am wrong, but you cannot ignore the similarities and Paul Pierce is better than Jayson Tatum until proven otherwise.
[/b]


Tatum has proven otherwise. I love Pierce, but Tatum’s talent is on another level. I think Jayson is already a better player and he is only 23.

Not until Tatum guts out some significant playoff wins. That's how I measure players.
Tatum has some significant playoff wins. And really, how many did Paul have before Danny put a super team around him? Tatum was the best player on 2 teams that got to the ECF at an age where Paul Pierce was still in college.

I love Paul Pierce, but whether you look at him at age 23 or at the same year of his career that Tatum is at, Tatum is a better player in almost every regard. 

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #27 on: September 11, 2021, 10:09:20 PM »

Offline greg683x

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4198
  • Tommy Points: 593
Until Tatum can get to the free throw line like Pierce did, im still taking Paul as the better player.  Especially in a playoff game
Tatum averaged nearly 10 free throw attempts a game in the playoff series against Brooklyn. Tatum is also 7% from the FT line over his first 4 years than Pierce was

That’s one series dude.  Yes it’s a playoff series but it’s one.

FTA per game Jayson Tatum
2017- 3.2
2018 - 2.9
2019- 4.7
2020- 5.3

In Pierces best years he’s averaging 8, 9, and 10 FTA per game.

Tatum is on an upward trend but he still has a lot work to do to get to the line like Pierce did.  If Tatum ever does, he’ll be a top 3 player in the league, and then yes, I’d definitely take him over Pierce




Greg

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #28 on: September 11, 2021, 10:23:22 PM »

Offline LilRip

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6987
  • Tommy Points: 411
I very well could be and yes, I would say Brown is a better player than Antoine Walker. My comparison is not a perfect match and I hope that I am wrong, but you cannot ignore the similarities and Paul Pierce is better than Jayson Tatum until proven otherwise.
[/b]


Tatum has proven otherwise. I love Pierce, but Tatum’s talent is on another level. I think Jayson is already a better player and he is only 23.

Not until Tatum guts out some significant playoff wins. That's how I measure players.

Tatum in 4 years:
- playoffs every year
- 27-23 record
- 2 ECF berths

Pierce in 4 years:
- reached playoffs once
- 9-7 record (10-7 if you want to give a free win because the 1st round was only 5 games then)
- 1 ECF berth

Looks like Tatum’s outpaced Pierce so far as per your metric.

- LilRip

Re: Are we the same as the early 2000's ?
« Reply #29 on: September 11, 2021, 11:34:39 PM »

Offline smokeablount

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3188
  • Tommy Points: 642
  • Mark Blount often got smoked
Until Tatum can get to the free throw line like Pierce did, im still taking Paul as the better player.  Especially in a playoff game
Tatum averaged nearly 10 free throw attempts a game in the playoff series against Brooklyn. Tatum is also 7% from the FT line over his first 4 years than Pierce was

That’s one series dude.  Yes it’s a playoff series but it’s one.

FTA per game Jayson Tatum
2017- 3.2
2018 - 2.9
2019- 4.7
2020- 5.3

In Pierces best years he’s averaging 8, 9, and 10 FTA per game.

Tatum is on an upward trend but he still has a lot work to do to get to the line like Pierce did.  If Tatum ever does, he’ll be a top 3 player in the league, and then yes, I’d definitely take him over Pierce

1) This thread is about 2001 not Pierce’s best years.

2) This thread is about who is better, not simply FTAs.
2023 Non-Active, Non-NBA 75 Historical Draft, SAB Bulls:

PG: Deron Williams 08 / John Wall 17
SG: David Thompson 78 (HOF) / Hersey Hawkins 91
SF: TMac 03 (HOF) / M.R. Richardson 81 / Tayshaun 07
PF: Larry Nance Sr 92 / Blake Griffin 14
C: Lanier 77 (HOF) / Brad Daugherty 91 / Camby 07