Trust me, I know this is a provocative statement given the lightning rod nature of Marcus Smart within the Boston faithful - but stay with me for a minute on this.
I've always felt the best, highest version of Marcus Smart would be kind of like DJ:
* A big, tough defensive guard
* Not the greatest shooter but can hit "enough" shots when needed, when it swings to him and when he's open
* Not the best passer, but a good fundamental passer
In addition to the above mentioned qualities, here are the other reasons I like it:
* Tatum is kind of an introvert. He leads by his play and production, but he is not outwardly emotive and he is not a "rah rah" level guy like so many championship teams have - guys that inspire the troops.
* Jaylen Brown is a super bright intellectual guy and player. But again, like Tatum he leads with his play and production but he is not a very emotive guy on the court. He's a vocal leader because of his high intelligence and passion on social matters but he's a bit of an introvert as well on the court.
Who on this team is our KG, Draymond, Kobe, Jordan, Bird, Dwayne Wade, LeBron, Rondo - the guy who's the chippy, no back down emotional engine of the team.? It's probably Marcus Smart.
So I'm suggesting this, in the soon to be post Kemba Celtics world:
Option #1, if Fournier proves to be a really good fit, Gordon Hayward type fit next to Tatum and Brown:
Time Lord
Tatum
Brown
Fournier
Smart
Advantages:
* Smart will never get hosed on D in the playoffs when teams head hunt smaller players like Kemba relentlessly
* He adds about as much toughness at the head of your D as you can ask for - he sets the tone for the team, he is the defensive quarterback - like KG. Robert Williams is the back line defense at the rim and in the middle. Sandwiched between these two guys you have a ton of offensive firepower.
Id' say as a coach - you tell Smart to do three things:
* Take the leadership responsibility, very vocally, along with Tatum and Brown to not only hold each other accountable but to lead, lift and inspire the rest of the team.
* His job is to quarterback the D, take good shots when they come to him but largely facilitate getting lobs for Time Lord and great shots for Tatum, Brown and Founier / Kemba....
What better long term point guard prospect do we have? But that's not the only reason I like this option - I actually think that in today's NBA you don't have to have the traditional drive and dish point. You need a guy who can hit shots when they come to him and not get killed defensively on switches come playoff time. Lastly, the ball needs to be in Tatum and Brown's hands on the offensive side of the ball as much as possible.
The majority of shot creation/playmaking rests in Tatum, Brown, Kemba (for now) Fournier and Smart's hands.
As far as general team construction moving forward and assuming Smart is the long term point with Pritchard and another vet backing him up, I'd either:
1. Commit to Fournier long term if he proves to be a great fit with Tatum and Brown. I'd then focus my mid level dollars, or a few young players via trade to secure a really solid, young PF for when I wanted to go bigger with Tatum and Brown at the 2 and 3 spots
or
2. If Fourneir isn't the longer term piece because I want to go bigger with a true PF and Tatum and Brown at the 2 and 3 spots, I'd consider signing Fournier and then eventually trading him, along with other young players and future draft picks to try and land a "very legitimate" young PF like John Collins if he becomes available. In this scenario, I'd be trying to put together:
Time Lord
Collins (or young meaningful and equivalent PF who can shoot from the outside)
Tatum
Brown
Smart
I'd give up a a lot to put that lineup together - or one similar to it.
But back to the main point - I like Smart as our long term point guard and spiritual or emotional leader, somebody has to play that role. Most great teams have a yard barker like Smart somewhere in their starting lineup. They're not perfect but their passion and emotional fire plays a very important role.
Thoughts?