« Reply #42 on: March 23, 2021, 12:00:25 PM »
Reading this thread just makes me think that Aaron Gordon is the better target. He's a similar player (super-athletic 4 who can play some 5) but is less expensive and I think (by reputation, anyway) is a better, more versatile defender and he's on a great contract.
Gordon is much less efficient, and is an inferior score and rebounder.
The contract is definitely better, but in terms of making an impact on our team, Collins would be a significantly better fit. He’s a legitimate part of a big three, whereas Gordon is just a nice role player.
I think that's probably right. The question is, is he so much better as to justify how much more money he'll cost? And not just the money but what that money does to team building going forward?
EDIT: It's also worth noting that Gordon is a much better playmaker than Collins.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2021, 12:07:34 PM by Big333223 »

Logged
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008, 2024