Author Topic: Frank Kaminsky available...  (Read 7313 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #15 on: December 20, 2020, 08:55:56 AM »

Offline IDreamCeltics

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1401
  • Tommy Points: 140
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.

What off-seasons have you been watching? Because the above is just completely false.

Also, Frank Kaminsky is terrible. There’s a reason nobody wants him.

Sorry, but he hits the 3 and is a lot better than the stiffs they've got out there now.  His per 36 splits were basically identical to Haywards last year and he'd come at like 1/10th the price-tag.

Last year Per 36:
Hayward 18.2 pts, 7.2 rbs 4.4 Ast
Kadinsky 17.7 pts 8.2 rebs 3.5 Ast

They're going to sign him, because they need him.

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #16 on: December 20, 2020, 09:08:35 AM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.

What off-seasons have you been watching? Because the above is just completely false.

Also, Frank Kaminsky is terrible. There’s a reason nobody wants him.

Sorry, but he hits the 3 and is a lot better than the stiffs they've got out there now.  His per 36 splits were basically identical to Haywards last year and he'd come at like 1/10th the price-tag.

Last year Per 36:
Hayward 18.2 pts, 7.2 rbs 4.4 Ast
Kadinsky 17.7 pts 8.2 rebs 3.5 Ast

They're going to sign him, because they need him.
More lame trolling.
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #17 on: December 20, 2020, 09:15:59 AM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.

What off-seasons have you been watching? Because the above is just completely false.

Also, Frank Kaminsky is terrible. There’s a reason nobody wants him.

Sorry, but he hits the 3 and is a lot better than the stiffs they've got out there now.  His per 36 splits were basically identical to Haywards last year and he'd come at like 1/10th the price-tag.

Last year Per 36:
Hayward 18.2 pts, 7.2 rbs 4.4 Ast
Kadinsky 17.7 pts 8.2 rebs 3.5 Ast

They're going to sign him, because they need him.
More lame trolling.

He hit the three at 33% last year. Semi Ojeleye (yes, Semi freakin Ojeleye) shot 38%.

Frank is useless on the defensive end. He would not be a good signing for us at the point in time.

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #18 on: December 20, 2020, 09:23:24 AM »

Offline IDreamCeltics

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1401
  • Tommy Points: 140
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.

What off-seasons have you been watching? Because the above is just completely false.

Also, Frank Kaminsky is terrible. There’s a reason nobody wants him.

Sorry, but he hits the 3 and is a lot better than the stiffs they've got out there now.  His per 36 splits were basically identical to Haywards last year and he'd come at like 1/10th the price-tag.

Last year Per 36:
Hayward 18.2 pts, 7.2 rbs 4.4 Ast
Kadinsky 17.7 pts 8.2 rebs 3.5 Ast

They're going to sign him, because they need him.
More lame trolling.

He hit the three at 33% last year. Semi Ojeleye (yes, Semi freakin Ojeleye) shot 38%.

Frank is useless on the defensive end. He would not be a good signing for us at the point in time.

33%?.. That's exactly what Hayward shot from 3 for the entire 2018-2019 season...

Frank's career 3% is .347
Hayward's career 3% is .366

Bring him in!!!

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #19 on: December 20, 2020, 09:50:43 AM »

Online greg683x

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4198
  • Tommy Points: 593
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.

So when we got eliminated by the Heat last season, that’s the thought you had??  The problem is we don’t have Kelly O anymore?
Greg

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #20 on: December 20, 2020, 10:18:01 AM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.

So when we got eliminated by the Heat last season, that’s the thought you had??  The problem is we don’t have Kelly O anymore?

Laughing my behind off

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #21 on: December 20, 2020, 10:24:28 AM »

Offline BringToughnessBack

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8700
  • Tommy Points: 1038
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.

What off-seasons have you been watching? Because the above is just completely false.

Also, Frank Kaminsky is terrible. There’s a reason nobody wants him.

Sorry, but he hits the 3 and is a lot better than the stiffs they've got out there now.  His per 36 splits were basically identical to Haywards last year and he'd come at like 1/10th the price-tag.

Last year Per 36:
Hayward 18.2 pts, 7.2 rbs 4.4 Ast
Kadinsky 17.7 pts 8.2 rebs 3.5 Ast

They're going to sign him, because they need him.
More lame trolling.

The trolling is ridiculous and brings up a much needed feature for this site...blocking.

In what universe is Hayward equal to Frank? That is the most ridiculous hypothesis ever. Like saying a pebble and boulder are the same.

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #22 on: December 20, 2020, 10:42:36 AM »

Offline IDreamCeltics

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1401
  • Tommy Points: 140
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.

What off-seasons have you been watching? Because the above is just completely false.

Also, Frank Kaminsky is terrible. There’s a reason nobody wants him.

Sorry, but he hits the 3 and is a lot better than the stiffs they've got out there now.  His per 36 splits were basically identical to Haywards last year and he'd come at like 1/10th the price-tag.

Last year Per 36:
Hayward 18.2 pts, 7.2 rbs 4.4 Ast
Kadinsky 17.7 pts 8.2 rebs 3.5 Ast

They're going to sign him, because they need him.
More lame trolling.

The trolling is ridiculous and brings up a much needed feature for this site...blocking.

In what universe is Hayward equal to Frank? That is the most ridiculous hypothesis ever. Like saying a pebble and boulder are the same.

I mean... you're actually the one trolling... This is a conversation about Frank Kaminsky.  I brought up that his Per 36 numbers were right in line with Charlotte Hornet Gordon Hayward's numbers last year...

I have no idea why someone would love Hayward and hate Kaminsky when they'll basically give you the same production per minute.   

maybe you need to check your biases?

I'll give you a pass on the trolling in this thread because a moderator started it (setting a bad example for everyone imo), but I honestly wish people would do better and bring facts or stats to back up their opinion rather than just following the lead of the first person who starts labeling and name-calling posters.

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #23 on: December 20, 2020, 11:58:06 AM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52796
  • Tommy Points: 2568
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.

So when we got eliminated by the Heat last season, that’s the thought you had??  The problem is we don’t have Kelly O anymore?

Kinda yeah.

Not so much the reason for being eliminated but certainly showing / reminding us what we are lacking in our big man rotation and that is skilled size.

Sullinger left. Olynyk left. Horford left.

They were our skilled size. They were big man that could pass the ball. That were decision makers on the ball. Who could be trusted with the ball. Who helped create ball movement and spacing. Guys who were threats to score the ball. Obviously at different levels of success - but they all provided an offensive threat.

Our bigs now are low skilled players. Paint cloggers in Tristan Thompson and Rob Williams (with promising passing ability). Theis is not a paint clogger but he is a low value threat away from the basket. He shoots the ball so infrequently from the perimeter that teams can help off of him comfortably. He is more of a rim runner rolling to the hoop than a perimeter threat and he is a good passer on those rim runs but not much passing otherwise.

We need more skill from our big man corps. We need somebody who is a threat to make jump-shots from the perimeter. Somebody who can facilitate the offense with their passing from the high post. We need that.

Watching Olynyk in that series was yet another reminder of what we are missing in our big man rotation. How basic and low skilled our big men have become.

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #24 on: December 20, 2020, 12:57:12 PM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.

What off-seasons have you been watching? Because the above is just completely false.

Also, Frank Kaminsky is terrible. There’s a reason nobody wants him.

Sorry, but he hits the 3 and is a lot better than the stiffs they've got out there now.  His per 36 splits were basically identical to Haywards last year and he'd come at like 1/10th the price-tag.

Last year Per 36:
Hayward 18.2 pts, 7.2 rbs 4.4 Ast
Kadinsky 17.7 pts 8.2 rebs 3.5 Ast

They're going to sign him, because they need him.
More lame trolling.

The trolling is ridiculous and brings up a much needed feature for this site...blocking.

In what universe is Hayward equal to Frank? That is the most ridiculous hypothesis ever. Like saying a pebble and boulder are the same.

I mean... you're actually the one trolling... This is a conversation about Frank Kaminsky.  I brought up that his Per 36 numbers were right in line with Charlotte Hornet Gordon Hayward's numbers last year...

I have no idea why someone would love Hayward and hate Kaminsky when they'll basically give you the same production per minute.   

maybe you need to check your biases?

I'll give you a pass on the trolling in this thread because a moderator started it (setting a bad example for everyone imo), but I honestly wish people would do better and bring facts or stats to back up their opinion rather than just following the lead of the first person who starts labeling and name-calling posters.

We gave you facts that disproved your claim and you avoided them to try and pass your opinion as “factual”.

That is a form of trolling.

Re: Frank Kaminsky available...
« Reply #25 on: December 20, 2020, 01:29:17 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45920
  • Tommy Points: 3340
I’d really like to pick up a few end of the bench type vets that can play when needed. Kaminsky is a low risk low cost type of signing. I do think the more pressing need is a defensive wing which would be filled if Romeo can ever get and stay on the court. Kaminsky adds some passing and is still a potential stretch 5. A Kelly lite. If you can sigh him to a non-gareenteed   contract it would seem like a no brainer.

Re: Frank Kaminsky available...
« Reply #26 on: December 20, 2020, 01:33:28 PM »

Online Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10300
  • Tommy Points: 465
Rather have him than Edwards, Semi, Grant, TimeLord, Waters, Green and that’s not saying much...Geez, this is almost our whole bench lol
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #27 on: December 20, 2020, 01:34:17 PM »

Offline Hoopvortex

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1243
  • Tommy Points: 164
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.

What off-seasons have you been watching? Because the above is just completely false.

Also, Frank Kaminsky is terrible. There’s a reason nobody wants him.

Sorry, but he hits the 3 and is a lot better than the stiffs they've got out there now.  His per 36 splits were basically identical to Haywards last year and he'd come at like 1/10th the price-tag.

Last year Per 36:
Hayward 18.2 pts, 7.2 rbs 4.4 Ast
Kadinsky 17.7 pts 8.2 rebs 3.5 Ast

They're going to sign him, because they need him.
More lame trolling.

The trolling is ridiculous and brings up a much needed feature for this site...blocking.

In what universe is Hayward equal to Frank? That is the most ridiculous hypothesis ever. Like saying a pebble and boulder are the same.

I mean... you're actually the one trolling... This is a conversation about Frank Kaminsky.  I brought up that his Per 36 numbers were right in line with Charlotte Hornet Gordon Hayward's numbers last year...

I have no idea why someone would love Hayward and hate Kaminsky when they'll basically give you the same production per minute.   

maybe you need to check your biases?

I'll give you a pass on the trolling in this thread because a moderator started it (setting a bad example for everyone imo), but I honestly wish people would do better and bring facts or stats to back up their opinion rather than just following the lead of the first person who starts labeling and name-calling posters.

You’re not trolling. I’m surprised that anyone would think so.



'I was proud of Marcus Smart. He did a great job of keeping us together. He might not get credit for this game, but the pace that he played at, and his playcalling, some of the plays that he called were great. We obviously have to rely on him, so I’m definitely looking forward to Marcus leading this team in that role.' - Jaylen Brown, January 2021

Re: Frank Kaminsky available...
« Reply #28 on: December 20, 2020, 01:41:03 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45920
  • Tommy Points: 3340
Rather have him than Edwards, Semi, Grant, TimeLord, Waters, Green and that’s not saying much...Geez, this is almost our whole bench lol

I think Grant Williams and Frank the Tank would make a nice bench duo.

Re: Frank Kandinsky available...
« Reply #29 on: December 20, 2020, 02:10:45 PM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18183
  • Tommy Points: 2747
  • bammokja
His defense is unacceptable. He won’t be coming to Boston.
I think you nailed itis .

Sorry, but have you seem this team?  He's the best Danny can do and badly needed.  I never thought when Kelly O left I 'd be saying we could use someone to fill his role, but they've added literally no talent over the past few years to the team.
kemba has no talent?  ???
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva