Can somebody explain how come our shooting percentage from 3-point-land is soo low in comparison with other playoff teams? While not having the Rockets-fire-away-style, the 3-pointer is a big component of the Celtics offense. Yet despite our best players are good shooters we aren't very efficient from the perimeter.
Of all the eight teams that made it to the second round in the playoffs the Celtics are dead last with a 3P% of just 34.1%.
The closest other teams are the Bucks (who had a terrible series) at 35.8% and the Lakers (less dependent on threes) at 35.9%. In the meantime the Clippers shoot 37.8%, the Heat shoot 38.0% and the Nuggets shoot a staggering 39.5%!
So each 3-point-shot on average yielded the following amount of points: Celtics (1.02), Lakers (1.08), Clippers (1.13), Heat (1.14) and Nuggets (1.19). That are very significant differences.
By the way, for 2-point-shots respectively: Celtics (1.06), Lakers (1.17), Clippers (1.09), Heat (1.06) and Nuggets (1.02). (doesn't include points won by and-ones)
Another point of attention is our low number of assists. The Clippers (that rely heavily on Leonard and George creating their own offense) are close in assist numbers, assist/turnover ratio etc., but all the other teams do a lot better than the Celtics in that department as well. Clearly improvements must be made on offense.