This is what happens when your front office is blindly in love with Small Ball and a team of 6-7, 6-8 perimeter players ............
You Cannot Score Inside and Cannot Defend Inside !!!!
Who, exactly, should they have gone after in FA? There were no better options than what we brought in
Jesus - I'm talking about the way the team has been constructed since the rebuild from Garnett's teams, not one free agency summer. And as for the summer, why do you use your treasure chest of draft picks to choose 3 guards and a 6-7 post player when you desperately need help inside ? Wanna know why - because you are blinded by the idea of a fast, athletic, perimeter team and have been since playing against the Lakers in the 80's.
Agreed - Ainge should have taken some of those inside-outside, two-way big men that are available in every draft, especially in the spots where we're picking
The fact if the matter is that great big men are almost impossible to find. You can spend every pick you ever get on projects, but there's no guarantee that any if the actually work out. You can try to trade for or sign one if the few great ones that are out there, but they rarely become available. You can overpay for the not-quite-a-star tier if big men, too (the Steven Adams' of the world), but does that actually make you better than getting stars at other positions and going for stop-gap big men?
Ainge considers star guards/wings more valuable than big men that would cost that he same amount (in draft capital, trades, FA, etc.) That's not the same thing as "hating big men" or whatever people want to accuse him of
And, since some people never seem to get this: you draft the BPA, not for need. Picks take time to work out (especially late picks and project bigs), and you don't know how the roster will look when they are finally useful in 3 years