I agree on most of what you say (slow foot, medium level player…) but I still think it isn't a stupid idea… We will probably never now if it was good or not… But he is one of the only guy for whom we Don't have to loose a big asset because of his level (Drummond or Turner who is probably unavalable without an overpay against a rival) or because of the salary (Capela or Adams). This trade has for me 3 advantages : probalby improve our interior sector/ defense, destabilise Memphis an Don't coast much or is a big risk and still tempting smtgh to match up better ag strenght bigs (as Danny said he regreted for last year, I doubt he won't do anything this one) …
And I would choose him without a doubt if he was 3/4 M less in his contract… Nurkic would have been a better option to me (on the same style of player) but with his injurie… I also think Blazers love him (we will se now that Whiteside step up a little) and won't let him go… With our 3 switchables forward and no real PF I Don't think it's stupid to have a fat big in the paint…
The trade you discribe isn't true : First Raptors were ready to overpay to win now and from what I see the trade was just JV, Delon Wright, CJ Miles and a 2d round for M Gasol… Actually their only assets still are JV and a future maybe 45 choice on draft...
And for Memphis there is sucking and SUCKING… Last year we waited all the Sac pick to be on 3-7 range and even when they begun to win people said they would fall down… It didn't happen. And with 7 we could have drafted Hayes or Hachimura who fited maybe better with the team future as Langford (OK both are ore off prospects)
If they continue to win as last moonth, we will again finish with 12-14 and loose maybe interesting interiors like Stewart or Onyekwu or a possibility of an unprotected lottery first…
And last thing with your name, you don't want an east european guy in our team Androslav ? Or maybe you are from Kaliningrad and dislike balt people
