My primary criticism is that we have drafted a number of guys who didn't seem to have the necessary focus/work ethic/competitiveness traits to succeed.
Williams
Yabusele
Young
Sullinger
Melo
Welcome to picking in the teens and 20s, where you get to choose between talents that have dropped because of other concerns or hard-workers that have risen above. Sometimes you pick the talent and hope that being a professional surrounded by other pros and coaches will help develop the work ethic. Other times you pick the hard worker. RJ Hunter was the hard-worker — he couldn’t get past that his talent want NBA-level. Some work out, some don’t.
Although I’ll say, this narrative that Yabu wasn’t a hard worker seems new in the last two days. Never heard that about him before. Sure, he has fitness concerns, but that could be as much of his body and genetics not being up to the task of being an NBA player as it is bad work ethic. I think he just wasn’t good enough. When he was picked, he was raw because he was new to basketball and the Celtics thought he could grow. That he didn’t grow might not mean he didn’t work, it might rather mean that the Celtics misjudged his ceiling.
It isn't just the work ethic. It is also a competitive nature. And players that have that get better between being 19 and being 23.
Yabu never added anything during his time here. He didn't lose 10 pounds, much less 20 pounds. He didn't become a better shooter, or add a jump hook, or a left hand, or learn how to bully inside or any of the other things that players do when they want it bad enough. None of the guys I listed did much. James Young got somewhat stronger, but he never had the competitive fire you need to see.
I have no idea how hard RJ Hunter worked. He didn't improve much over several years. I know that.
You don't know how hard any of them worked. Some people aren't NBA material no matter how hard they work or want it. You are basing how hard they work on what you can see and that isn't much. Maybe they tried hard to get better at other things or maybe they tried to focus on 1-2 things that could work for them as a role-player, but in the end they just aren't good enough. This isn't magic, some people just don't have what it takes.
Yes, all I know is that they didn't improve at anything, which is the bottom line.
How exactly do you know whether they improved at anything when you never saw them play? You didn't see the things they were bad at and you didn't get to see whether they improved or not. You saw nothing.
Now you are getting belligerent.
I watch some of virtually every game, including summer leagues and preseason. I did see them play, even the ones that didn't play much.
It is a reasonable assumption that a young player entering a professional environment with high end developmental resources should improve between ages 19-23. There are occasionally extenuating circumstances out of the player's control, but that process should work out for the majority of 1st round level talents.
Given the vast number of games and the profile these guys have, its tedious to claim that a fan cannot have an informed opinion on any NBA player that spends multiple years on a roster. We can. This isn't the CIA. It's the NBA.