Total Members Voted: 44
0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
I can't seem to shake the feel when I watch both players playing. They are good, but tend lack something. I checked AW stats and are about what I am expecting JT to be at next season....taking 2019 performance as baseline. What say you?
Quote from: Roy H. on March 31, 2019, 10:37:46 AMQuote from: IDreamCeltics on March 30, 2019, 04:56:54 PMQuote from: keevsnick on March 30, 2019, 02:44:14 PMQuote from: IDreamCeltics on March 30, 2019, 02:20:57 PMI think Tatum has just been utilized incorrectly. In his first season his shooting percentages were .475/.434/.82 . That's Klay Thompson/Ray Allen/ Bradley Beal like. He's also built a lot like those guys. I get that he's an inch or two taller, but he's built like a cross country runner... Why he's not running people around screens and being fed shots off the move is beyond me. His iso game is above average, but why would you make one of the best pure shooters the team has ever had essentially a static target for his defenders? Why not wear them down? So no, he doesn't remind me or Andrew Wiggins - at all. Except that I thought Wiggins would be an all-NBA level defender with the right coach and I think coaching is all that's keeping Tatum from being one of the NBA's best shooters.Probably because those type of shots are generally harder than the ones he's already taken, and he's only hitting 36% of those right now? I think Tatum's a good shooter, but he's not some generational or even elite one. The 43% from his first year was bolstered by taking only about 3 per game (as opposed to the elite shooters who are up above 6 or 7), and hitting an unsustainable clip from the corners.Welp... here's the comparison of Tatum's shooting during his first two years to Ray Allen's first two years. Age 2p% 3p% 3PARay Allen96-97 21 .448 .393 3.697-98 22 .453 .364 4.5Jayson Tatum17-18 19 .492 .434 3.018-19 20 .487 .369 4.5The kid's a generational talent...Do you know how many rookies have shot at least 39% on 3PTs (2.0+ attempts per game) in just the past four seasons?19 rookies. Just since 2016. “Generational” is a stretch.Ahhh yes, but how many rookies have shot .43+ from 3 in the last four years on 2+ attempts?Ohhhh… I'll save you the time, just one. Tatum... But I'm guessing you already knew that since you carefully cherry-picked the parameters of your post. But do you also know the last Rookie to shoot .43+ from 3 on 2+ attempts?... Steph Curry in 2009.I stand by my claim that he's a generational talent, but please, don't let facts get in the way of your arguement.
Quote from: IDreamCeltics on March 30, 2019, 04:56:54 PMQuote from: keevsnick on March 30, 2019, 02:44:14 PMQuote from: IDreamCeltics on March 30, 2019, 02:20:57 PMI think Tatum has just been utilized incorrectly. In his first season his shooting percentages were .475/.434/.82 . That's Klay Thompson/Ray Allen/ Bradley Beal like. He's also built a lot like those guys. I get that he's an inch or two taller, but he's built like a cross country runner... Why he's not running people around screens and being fed shots off the move is beyond me. His iso game is above average, but why would you make one of the best pure shooters the team has ever had essentially a static target for his defenders? Why not wear them down? So no, he doesn't remind me or Andrew Wiggins - at all. Except that I thought Wiggins would be an all-NBA level defender with the right coach and I think coaching is all that's keeping Tatum from being one of the NBA's best shooters.Probably because those type of shots are generally harder than the ones he's already taken, and he's only hitting 36% of those right now? I think Tatum's a good shooter, but he's not some generational or even elite one. The 43% from his first year was bolstered by taking only about 3 per game (as opposed to the elite shooters who are up above 6 or 7), and hitting an unsustainable clip from the corners.Welp... here's the comparison of Tatum's shooting during his first two years to Ray Allen's first two years. Age 2p% 3p% 3PARay Allen96-97 21 .448 .393 3.697-98 22 .453 .364 4.5Jayson Tatum17-18 19 .492 .434 3.018-19 20 .487 .369 4.5The kid's a generational talent...Do you know how many rookies have shot at least 39% on 3PTs (2.0+ attempts per game) in just the past four seasons?19 rookies. Just since 2016. “Generational” is a stretch.
Quote from: keevsnick on March 30, 2019, 02:44:14 PMQuote from: IDreamCeltics on March 30, 2019, 02:20:57 PMI think Tatum has just been utilized incorrectly. In his first season his shooting percentages were .475/.434/.82 . That's Klay Thompson/Ray Allen/ Bradley Beal like. He's also built a lot like those guys. I get that he's an inch or two taller, but he's built like a cross country runner... Why he's not running people around screens and being fed shots off the move is beyond me. His iso game is above average, but why would you make one of the best pure shooters the team has ever had essentially a static target for his defenders? Why not wear them down? So no, he doesn't remind me or Andrew Wiggins - at all. Except that I thought Wiggins would be an all-NBA level defender with the right coach and I think coaching is all that's keeping Tatum from being one of the NBA's best shooters.Probably because those type of shots are generally harder than the ones he's already taken, and he's only hitting 36% of those right now? I think Tatum's a good shooter, but he's not some generational or even elite one. The 43% from his first year was bolstered by taking only about 3 per game (as opposed to the elite shooters who are up above 6 or 7), and hitting an unsustainable clip from the corners.Welp... here's the comparison of Tatum's shooting during his first two years to Ray Allen's first two years. Age 2p% 3p% 3PARay Allen96-97 21 .448 .393 3.697-98 22 .453 .364 4.5Jayson Tatum17-18 19 .492 .434 3.018-19 20 .487 .369 4.5The kid's a generational talent...
Quote from: IDreamCeltics on March 30, 2019, 02:20:57 PMI think Tatum has just been utilized incorrectly. In his first season his shooting percentages were .475/.434/.82 . That's Klay Thompson/Ray Allen/ Bradley Beal like. He's also built a lot like those guys. I get that he's an inch or two taller, but he's built like a cross country runner... Why he's not running people around screens and being fed shots off the move is beyond me. His iso game is above average, but why would you make one of the best pure shooters the team has ever had essentially a static target for his defenders? Why not wear them down? So no, he doesn't remind me or Andrew Wiggins - at all. Except that I thought Wiggins would be an all-NBA level defender with the right coach and I think coaching is all that's keeping Tatum from being one of the NBA's best shooters.Probably because those type of shots are generally harder than the ones he's already taken, and he's only hitting 36% of those right now? I think Tatum's a good shooter, but he's not some generational or even elite one. The 43% from his first year was bolstered by taking only about 3 per game (as opposed to the elite shooters who are up above 6 or 7), and hitting an unsustainable clip from the corners.
I think Tatum has just been utilized incorrectly. In his first season his shooting percentages were .475/.434/.82 . That's Klay Thompson/Ray Allen/ Bradley Beal like. He's also built a lot like those guys. I get that he's an inch or two taller, but he's built like a cross country runner... Why he's not running people around screens and being fed shots off the move is beyond me. His iso game is above average, but why would you make one of the best pure shooters the team has ever had essentially a static target for his defenders? Why not wear them down? So no, he doesn't remind me or Andrew Wiggins - at all. Except that I thought Wiggins would be an all-NBA level defender with the right coach and I think coaching is all that's keeping Tatum from being one of the NBA's best shooters.