Author Topic: An interesting Paul George stat to Consider  (Read 3712 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: An interesting Paul George stat to Consider
« Reply #15 on: April 03, 2017, 09:25:08 PM »

Offline The One

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2017
  • Tommy Points: 203
PG13 is filthy!

He's a better fit than Butler.

Re: An interesting Paul George stat to Consider
« Reply #16 on: April 03, 2017, 09:26:56 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
PG13 is filthy!

He's a better fit than Butler.

Why not both?  ;D ;D
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: An interesting Paul George stat to Consider
« Reply #17 on: April 03, 2017, 11:58:27 PM »

Offline playdream

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1665
  • Tommy Points: 88
PG to me is a loser that can never go past Lebron, even when he had his support or when the Cavs is in slump, like CP3 in some way
I don't want to give up too much for that kind of guy
with this logic, kg was a loser for being the best player on the timberwolves but never doing work in the playoffs
KG never had enough support with the wolfs. and when he did he won it all
you exchange PG and KG for that team and the outcome is different

Re: An interesting Paul George stat to Consider
« Reply #18 on: April 04, 2017, 12:55:50 AM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8781
  • Tommy Points: 856
PG to me is a loser that can never go past Lebron, even when he had his support or when the Cavs is in slump, like CP3 in some way
I don't want to give up too much for that kind of guy
with this logic, kg was a loser for being the best player on the timberwolves but never doing work in the playoffs
KG never had enough support with the wolfs. and when he did he won it all
you exchange PG and KG for that team and the outcome is different
George had good teammates, but Roy Hibbert, Lance Stephenson, George Hill and David West is not a dynamite supporting cast.

especially considering he was up against James-Wade-Bosh

Re: An interesting Paul George stat to Consider
« Reply #19 on: April 04, 2017, 10:54:34 AM »

Offline tankcity!

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1903
  • Tommy Points: 129
He's been my guy for a while. People mostly prefer Butler, but George seems to be a player that has another gear for the playoffs and that is why I always preferred George.

I wouldn't give up any good assets for him. I'd offer the Memphis pick and Crowder. Otherwise I would attempt to sign him in Free Agency. Let's be real about this. Nobody knows where George would sign. People always associate players with the Lakers and it hasn't panned out in a long long time. I think if the Lakers are truly competing with the Celtics for George via free agency, then it's laughable to think George would sign there. He's going to go where it gives him the best chance to win...Look at Free Agency the past 10 years, only Melo went to a team that wasn't a contender. We're going to be better next season and I truly think George will be open to signing with us after some recruiting.

Re: An interesting Paul George stat to Consider
« Reply #20 on: April 04, 2017, 04:38:10 PM »

Offline spikelovetheCelts

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1616
  • Tommy Points: 113
  • Peace it's a board. We all will never agree.
He will be a Laker if he leaves INDY Period. He will not be a  happy Celtic. Hayward is our best move. H e cost only money. Keep our future with our picks is wise for us to keep winning. We can beat the Warriors soon enough.
"People look at players, watch them dribble between their legs and they say, 'There's a superstar.'  Well John Havlicek is a superstar, and most of the others are figments of writers' imagination."
--Jerry West, on John Havlicek