Unless we are talking about acquiring a legit big, I do not want any more players who cannot shoot.
Game has definitely changed. Today's NBA is all about having one player who can get into the paint or maybe command a double team on the box and everyone else just spots up. Or get out in transition and then everyone spots up. Move the ball faster than the defense can rotate and knock down a three.
This is the NBA today. Unless you can finish right at the rim, second best option is an open look at a three. Some rare exceptions to this, but if you cannot shoot the three today.....you lose.
Miami shot 51.4 % from the field last night against OKC and lost by 17 at home. OKC shot 16-27 from three. It is a shooters league, more so than ever before and that is the quickest way out of this mess IMO.
In a 7 game series though, I don't see 16-27 holding up. Miami is still the better team, not that they can't shoot
They do not have to shoot 16-27. 33% from the three equals 50% from the two. OKC won by 17 even though they were down 22 - 4 to start. Miami played the same way and took about 19 threes.
Perk and Steven Adams played 7 minutes combined total and PJ3 played 30 minutes at the 5 position. Brooks gave up rim protection against two of the better get to the rack guys in the league (LeBron and Wade) for someone who could match up against Bosh at the three point line and also spot up himself.
I hate this kind of basketball, but it is what the NBA is all about right now. Not enough superstars to go around. Channing Fry is as valuable as Asik and Bosh is as valuable as Hibbert, because they can take an opposing big outside and knock down shots.
Even if you get the superstars with the old idea of "it takes 3 all-stars to win a title" you cannot afford to keep them anyway. Hence OKC had to dump Harden. Indiana might not be able to keep Stephenson.
OKC lost a top ten player and get to the rim guy in Harden, but they acquired a knock down 3 point shooter in Jeremy Lamb who does not need the ball to replace him.