Author Topic: 82Games.com stats -- very revealing  (Read 2323 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

82Games.com stats -- very revealing
« on: February 03, 2010, 12:15:50 AM »

Offline byennie

  • Webmaster
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2616
  • Tommy Points: 3047
These stats of course don't always tell the whole story, but I thought this particular page DOES reflect some pretty interesting points:

http://www.82games.com/0910/0910BOS1.HTM

1) Our starters are pretty good, our bench is pretty bad
2) Tony Allen is playing defense
3) Garnett still makes the defense "go"
4) Ray Allen still means a lot to our offense

None of this is news, but it tells me we can still contend if Garnett stays healthy and Tony Allen + Marquis Daniels help solidify our rotation. And while Ray Ray's numbers may be shifted by the fact that often when he leaves the court we get Eddie House slumping, we could be in trouble if we replace him with someone who's not a scorer.

FWIW

Re: 82Games.com stats -- very revealing
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2010, 01:42:38 AM »

Offline ben

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 456
  • Tommy Points: 43
It also shows how Glen Davis is our second worst player. 

Shelden Williams looks pretty good.

Re: 82Games.com stats -- very revealing
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2010, 07:43:40 AM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
It also shows how Glen Davis is our second worst player. 

Shelden Williams looks pretty good.

The problem is, Davis came back when the C's as a team started playing terribly (not to mention when KG was out), while Williams played a lot of minutes when the team was playing its best basketball of the year.  And I would argue (very strongly) that Williams and Davis did not have a strong affect on the way the rest of the team played during those stretches. 

This is why this is a pretty deceiving stat.  It just does not show you the context for guys who have been in and out of the rotation.

Re: 82Games.com stats -- very revealing
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2010, 07:49:48 AM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
It also shows how Glen Davis is our second worst player. 

Shelden Williams looks pretty good.

The problem is, Davis came back when the C's as a team started playing terribly (not to mention when KG was out), while Williams played a lot of minutes when the team was playing its best basketball of the year.  And I would argue (very strongly) that Williams and Davis did not have a strong affect on the way the rest of the team played during those stretches. 

This is why this is a pretty deceiving stat.  It just does not show you the context for guys who have been in and out of the rotation.

Yep. The difference is Marquis Daniels. It's funny because the chinks in the armor started showing up shortly after Quisy got hurt. It was only a week later when we lost to Philly at home.

Re: 82Games.com stats -- very revealing
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2010, 09:24:16 AM »

Offline Celtics17

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 874
  • Tommy Points: 108
You know what statistics tell you? If you have your head in an oven and your behind in a freezer, on average, you are doing pretty well.

Got to agree that the loss of Marquis hurts the team much more then stats would probably show.

Re: 82Games.com stats -- very revealing
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2010, 02:11:32 PM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
Looks like Walker should be on the All-NBA defensive team!

Re: 82Games.com stats -- very revealing
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2010, 02:25:10 PM »

Offline Big_Matt34

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 629
  • Tommy Points: 80
82games is slacking this year, it hasnt even updated the Celtics numbers since 1/25.