0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
I'm not a Doc basher. However, it seems to me that Mike Fratello just might be the kind of coach that this team needs. He's very good at running a half-court offense, and his teams play good defense.
I think I'd rather "suffer" through Doc than watch a team that averages 70 points a night (even if they're winning by doing so)
Quote from: Redz on April 30, 2008, 09:54:41 AMI think I'd rather "suffer" through Doc than watch a team that averages 70 points a night (even if they're winning by doing so)I don't think that will be a problem in Boston. Boston has scorers. Cleveland didn't.
Quote from: wdleehi on April 30, 2008, 09:56:31 AMQuote from: Redz on April 30, 2008, 09:54:41 AMI think I'd rather "suffer" through Doc than watch a team that averages 70 points a night (even if they're winning by doing so)I don't think that will be a problem in Boston. Boston has scorers. Cleveland didn't. Oh, he'd find a way. Like him as a color guy on TV though.(I'm still robot dancing here)
Quote from: Barnabas on April 30, 2008, 08:17:46 AMI'm not a Doc basher. However, it seems to me that Mike Fratello just might be the kind of coach that this team needs. He's very good at running a half-court offense, and his teams play good defense. That's all well and good, but shouldn't this stuff wait until after the playoffs are over for the Celtics?? Like him or not, Doc is our coach for at least the remainder of the year, so it doesn't make much sense speculating or wondering about potential coaches when we're still in the playoffs. Why does it seem like so much talk right now is similar to this time last year, when we went 24-58 and didn't make the playoffs?? C'mon people, I know it's a bit depressing for the team to have lost 2 in a row to the Hawks, but we're still in good position to win the series and we still have home court throughout the playoffs.