« Reply #92 on: February 28, 2021, 11:31:56 AM »
I've always been a big Brad fan. I still am. I think he's a great coach. I also think that at a certain point, getting a new voice in the locker room and getting a new set of eyes on the players can be valuable. Not just any voice or any eyes. Don't fire Brad to bring in a worse coach. But we're talking about 8 years here. 8 years where the team usually over-performed expectations (with one big exception that I don't think you can blame on Stevens).
This year, the team has talent but is losing winnable games and isn't playing with cohesion. If Kemba and Smart get healthy and they reel off some wins and wind up the 3rd seed and making a deep run, then maybe it'll all be fine. But if they finish 37-35, it might be time.
The only player that's he's coached that long is Marcus Smart. With the sheer amount of roster turnover we've had, no player has really been here long enough to justify "tuning him out".
Yes here's how long each player has been coached by Brad:
Player Time Coached (yrs)
Smart 6
Brown 4
Tatum 3
Ojeleye 3
Theis 3
Walker 2
R. Williams 2
G. Williams 1
J. Green 1
Edwards 1
Waters 1
Fall 1
Langford 1
Pritchard <1
Teague <1
Nesmith <1
Thompson <1
Maybe it's the fans that are tuning him out. Good thing we're not on the team 
I didn't mean to defend the "tuning him out" narrative. I think you're both right about the players side. I'm more thinking about the Brad side. He's been in the same place for going on 8 years now. What does that do to him? What kind of precedent is there for a coach being with a team for that long without winning it all and then finally winning it all?
It could definitely happen and I'm not advocating for Stevens to be fired but I do wonder how long you keep a coach around, even if he's doing a good job, before it becomes more valuable (from an institutional standpoint) just to reset.

Logged
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008, 2024