Height cannot be taught.
Speed and quickness are surely more important, especially in today's wide-open game. But if you add height to quickness… Then you've really got something.
The only gimmick that seemed to work was Phil Jackson's use of the triangle.
How is the triangle a gimmick? It's a structured way to get open shots through ball and man movement. It is team basketball at its purest, which is why that old codger Jackson loves it so much. For him, team ball is an expression of an ideal, of a team playing together selflessly. Whether the result is a lot of inefficient midrange jumpers and post-ups is a separate question.
I am not confident in starting Isaiah, Avery and Marcus together. I watched Doc Rivers play a lot of three guard lineups, but I think Doc's idea was to have the best players on the court as if height doesn't matter. I don't sense Brad does it for the same reason, but more because it is what it is and survival while key guys are out.
After the Denver game, Brad Stevens said that what was missing was guys "standing their ground". Enough said.
Danny could have signed Zizac. We might have a better record right now despite losing Horford.
I'm afraid that you've overestimated him. Do you think that the Celtics made a mistake in letting someone else develop his game? They did that because he's a longshot to make the league, and an even longer shot to one day, someday, play with Boston.
Evan Turner is not very good at defense. He probably still would've been a better option than anyone else currently on the roster, but that's not saying much.
I thought he was quite good last year. More surprising, you seem to think that the roster is stocked with subpar defenders. I disagree.
James Young simply takes up space. We don't need more than Green or Young for one scrub to be the third small forward/tall shooting guard.
I'm counting Crowder, Smart, and Brown (who is already getting rotation minutes). Avery already gets starter's minutes. The competition is for fifth wing.
I was shocked that Young was kept. I figured RJ deserved another year and a chance to grow into an NBA body.
I hated to see RJ go; he knows how to play. But I am not surprised by Boston's decision, which I take to be a judgment that his body may not survive in the league.
We needed a tall shooting guard. Datome seemed decent enough.
I think you meant to say "Klay".
Isaiah, Avery and Smart are a good three-fourths of a guard rotation, but we are missing a tall guard and that makes us vulnerable.
Just to point out: if you take him at his word, Brad sees four positions, namely: ball handlers, wings, swings, and bigs.
We got by one or two years with Sully, Olynyk, Zeller with Bass/Humphries, but at some point one gets tired of always having to be David against Goliath.
Boston was a top-five defensive team last year. And, to remind you of how that particular story turned out, David won and Goliath lost.
Instead of Zeller and Young, we could have had Zizac and Nader.
Well, Nader has a ways to go, but I think that it's fair to say that Danny Ainge agrees with you about him, or at least about his potential, since they are keeping him close. Good body, acts decisively, beautiful stroke, shoots with range. As for Zizic, it would be quite an accomplishment for him to make it to the Big Show, but as I said before I'm skeptical.
In Danny's defense, he couldn't have known Horford and Crowder would get hurt.
No need to defend him, as far as I am concerned. I think he's done a bang-up job!