Author Topic: Love is a dud  (Read 3343 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Love is a dud
« Reply #30 on: June 20, 2016, 01:55:14 PM »

Offline dreamgreen

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3558
  • Tommy Points: 182
He would most likely be the best player on our team if he came here. It's hard to be third fiddle when you're used to being the top dog. Impossible for Love to get into a groove with queen and Irving dominating the ball continuously. He would be our best rebounder by a long shot too.

Re: Love is a dud
« Reply #31 on: June 20, 2016, 02:06:30 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32761
  • Tommy Points: 1732
  • What a Pub Should Be
Problem with Love to me, is the money.

If you're the Celtics, do you really want to be tying up that much cap room with a player that very well is not the missing piece to being a true contender?


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Love is a dud
« Reply #32 on: June 20, 2016, 02:46:40 PM »

Offline celticsclay

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16178
  • Tommy Points: 1407
Problem with Love to me, is the money.

If you're the Celtics, do you really want to be tying up that much cap room with a player that very well is not the missing piece to being a true contender?

I don't. Is he a player other players are clamoring to line up with? Didn't his teammates in minnesota say he wasn't a leader? He has also struggled with fit tremendously in Cleveland and pouted at times. While the stuff in Cleveland isn't all his fault, he certainly has come off as a kind of a mentally fragile diva for quite a while.

Re: Love is a dud
« Reply #33 on: June 20, 2016, 02:50:27 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Problem with Love to me, is the money.

If you're the Celtics, do you really want to be tying up that much cap room with a player that very well is not the missing piece to being a true contender?
Given how much cap room we'll have and how much cap room players like Turner, Bismack Biyambo, and Kent Bazemore will command.

Yes, sign me up.

Re: Love is a dud
« Reply #34 on: June 20, 2016, 02:53:04 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32761
  • Tommy Points: 1732
  • What a Pub Should Be
Problem with Love to me, is the money.

If you're the Celtics, do you really want to be tying up that much cap room with a player that very well is not the missing piece to being a true contender?
Given how much cap room we'll have and how much cap room players like Turner, Bismack Biyambo, and Kent Bazemore will command.

Yes, sign me up.

I'm not so sure I would.    Although I wouldn't touch any of those guys, either.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Love is a dud
« Reply #35 on: June 20, 2016, 02:55:35 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Problem with Love to me, is the money.

If you're the Celtics, do you really want to be tying up that much cap room with a player that very well is not the missing piece to being a true contender?
Given how much cap room we'll have and how much cap room players like Turner, Bismack Biyambo, and Kent Bazemore will command.

Yes, sign me up.

I'm not so sure I would.    Although I wouldn't touch any of those guys, either.
Man remember when Scal's 3 million per year for 5 was an albatross.

 :laugh:

NBA has come a long way.

Re: Love is a dud
« Reply #36 on: June 20, 2016, 03:15:05 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
I don't really consider Love a dud. I just think he's a player that is a skilled offensive stretch four with the ability to grab defensive boards, and punish the glass when there isn't any other skilled rebounders on the floor like Tristan Thompson for example competing with.

His outlet passing is something that I am going to be 100% positive Stevens would use more of.

The problem that everyone has with Love is his inability to adapt to being the 3rd banana, or being used mainly or strictly only as a stretch four, which is definitively the wrong usage of a player like him. Lue did a great job with Love, but he stopped forcing him to go to the post. Yes, I understand people don't think Love can play in the post, but I think he can play in the post, as long as there's other offensive weapons on the floor to force the other teams to choose to double team Love, or go 1 on 1 with him down low.

Love may not be the two way player wing that we have been searching for. But he certainly improves our passing, rebounding, shooting, and scoring all in one player. I would take him over Sullinger, KO, and Amir. I agree with all accounts, that Love must be put next to a shot blocker or rim protector, but only because Love is offensively great enough to make up for the deficiencies the center would have.

If the Cavs would like to give up Love for AB+a late first round pick, and KO, I'm all for it.

Love would still be an Allstar, and able to at least put up 18/10/2, which is something we have desperately wished for Sullinger to have thrown up in his time here in Boston.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different