Man, Stevens dropped the ball in this one big time.
The one time they should've went small with Crowder on Randle and Turner or Smart on Kobe, and it takes Brad until the fourth quarter to do it.
I was thinking the same thing. I've been on Stevens' ass about going small and the one time I would've applauded it, he didn't go for it.
Whatever.
Then instead of surrounding Turner, who was a one man offensive army, with our best defenders he kept him surrounded with some of our weakest defenders. So for all the good Turner did, we couldn't get stops regardless.
I just don't know how this dude's mind works.
Unfortunately, even with all of Stevens' good aspects I think this is just one of his downfalls that we're going to have to live with. He likes to be dynamic in his rotations, but I just don't agree and think that chemistry is more important that playing each matchup with differing lineups and rotations. I know many of us have been screaming this same thing ever since the start of last year.
And there is a need to be dynamic...
I was watching last night but not as intently as usual. The Lakers seemed to play fast and small the whole night, but of particular note is towards the end of the game they had Randle at the 5, with I think Kobe as the 4. That lineup allowed Clarkson to dominate and kept the Cs scrambling.
I thought it was a poorly coached game though. Why did Zeller and Hunter get DNPs when Zeller had been playing so well? Amir Johnson was a -17 last night and Zeller doesn't see the floor?
Having said that - it really came down to shooting. Lakers were almost 50% from 3 while the Celtics where 25%. Not gonna win many games like that.