the pencil-neck geek is going to ruin the NBA. He is letting the players run the show, and he does not even know how to rrrri.. errr I mean run the lottery.
I was kind of thinking about this the other day. because of what Stephen A. Smith said about how "the players demand to know; if it's not a unanimous vote by the owners to get Sterling out that the players should know what owners voted against it."
I personally think it shouldn't be made public. they should just let us know if there's enough to get him out or not. if not then and only then make it public.
but honestly if there are some that don't vote to get him out i'm not sure the NBA wants to open this can of worms because you could pretty much see a long strike ahead.
I was actually thinking the other day, what if Wyc voted to not remove Sterling, just to cause a little turmoil and hope the Clippers crumble next season because of it (and that 1st round pick of theirs that we own becomes a top lottery pick)?
I wonder if there's some conference or division rivals thinking the same thing. Don't want to lose to the Blake and CP show for the next 5+ years, so I'll vote to keep Sterling and hope his team implodes (I'm looking at you GS and LAL).
I figure if it's secret ballot that has a chance, public ballot no way.
ahh see this is what I was getting at. and why I was saying it should remain secret. as mad as the players and Stephen A. Smith might be if some owners don't vote to get sterling out. those owners shouldn't have to validate their reasons for which way they vote.