Author Topic: Austin Rivers  (Read 8563 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #30 on: December 17, 2013, 12:00:31 AM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
AB not handling the ball = twice the player PG AB is.

You're either underrating SG AB or overrating PG AB.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #31 on: December 17, 2013, 12:21:16 AM »

Offline jc3celticsphan

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 513
  • Tommy Points: 20
i would take rivers if we could get rid of wallace

and watch the same thing that happen with crawford happen with rivers lol

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #32 on: December 17, 2013, 12:21:41 AM »

Offline WeMadeIt17

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3397
  • Tommy Points: 435
No thanks.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #33 on: December 17, 2013, 12:23:04 AM »

Offline celticslove

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1760
  • Tommy Points: 188
we already have marshon brooks, why would we add another marshon type player? now if you we could swap the two then why not.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #34 on: December 17, 2013, 12:48:36 AM »

Offline jyyzzoel

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 410
  • Tommy Points: 47
Personally, believe if the celtics are going after him, Rondo will be dealt.

Austin rivers can't ball. He should have gone in the late second round. Phil pressey is as productive as Austin rivers. Rivers is not a future all star, borderline all star, or even starter. He's a second string player at best. He had the worst rookie season of all rookies ever... Not just of his draft class... Ever. He would do well in the d league though, or maybe in Europe. There's just no way he should be in the nba.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #35 on: December 17, 2013, 12:53:30 AM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
we already have marshon brooks, why would we add another marshon type player? now if you we could swap the two then why not.

Because Rivers makes too much relative to Brooks.  Swapping them would put the Celtics in the luxury tax.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #36 on: December 17, 2013, 01:00:40 AM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7377
  • Tommy Points: 570
At this point he's worth a 2nd round pick.  I would give that up for him.  Again I'm not sure that anyone's noticed but every rotation player save for Wallace is exceeding expectations right now.  Seems to me that has a lot to do with a coach who seems to have a knack for getting the most out of his players.  I'd roll the dice on Rivers so long as he doesn't cost much and see what Stevens can do with a guy who not long ago was considered a potential all star.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #37 on: December 17, 2013, 04:44:00 AM »

Online SparzWizard

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18855
  • Tommy Points: 1119
Celtics Blog and its forums always find ways to entertain me.

This one was a big laugh. Rondo for Austin Rivers. Ha ha ha.


#FireJoe
#JTJB (Just Trade Jaylen Brown) 2022 - 2025
I am the Master of Panic.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #38 on: December 17, 2013, 05:55:00 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20107
  • Tommy Points: 1331
Quote
Personally, believe if the celtics are going after him, Rondo will be dealt.

I don't.  I think AB's not taking the contract extension will seal his fate as trade bait.   I could us shipping AB for him with us getting a pick.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #39 on: December 17, 2013, 08:13:36 AM »

Offline beklog

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1248
  • Tommy Points: 64
Celtics Blog and its forums always find ways to entertain me.

This one was a big laugh. Rondo for Austin Rivers. Ha ha ha.

this trade makes the Rondo - Felton/Shumpert more believable :P
Amateurs worry about equipment, professionals worry about money, masters worry about light… I just take pictures…

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #40 on: December 17, 2013, 09:56:10 AM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
rivers looks like a bit of a bust.  I could see Bradley for Rivers...  Boston probably wants to avoid paying Bradley. Rivers is young enough that he could still have a career.


Lol. Sometimes I just can't. Please help me make it through trade season Lord. Just no. NO.
Well I mean at first glance it's a ridiculous trade.  Clearly Bradley is vastly superior to Rivers right now.  Rivers first 76 games have been nothing short of catastrophic. 

But Rivers was thought to be one of the best players in his draft class.  At one point he was pegged as a "future star".  He was a top 10 pick.  He's been dreadful...

  People should consider this, and the fact that Bradley was a top rated prospect as well, when they're talking about how the 2014 draft class is can't miss because the talent evaluators are so accurate.


   Now, back to your regularly scheduled thread.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #41 on: December 17, 2013, 10:01:11 AM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
rivers looks like a bit of a bust.  I could see Bradley for Rivers...  Boston probably wants to avoid paying Bradley. Rivers is young enough that he could still have a career.


Lol. Sometimes I just can't. Please help me make it through trade season Lord. Just no. NO.
Well I mean at first glance it's a ridiculous trade.  Clearly Bradley is vastly superior to Rivers right now.  Rivers first 76 games have been nothing short of catastrophic. 

But Rivers was thought to be one of the best players in his draft class.  At one point he was pegged as a "future star".  He was a top 10 pick.  He's been dreadful...

  People should consider this, and the fact that Bradley was a top rated prospect as well, when they're talking about how the 2014 draft class is can't miss because the talent evaluators are so accurate.


   Now, back to your regularly scheduled thread.

Chauncey Billups was a top-3 pick who didn't live up to that billing until his fifth season in the league, playing for his fourth team. He eventually became a Finals MVP.

Do you expect all draft picks to enter their rookie season fully-formed?
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #42 on: December 17, 2013, 10:13:03 AM »

Offline dasani

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 278
  • Tommy Points: 32
They weren't willing to trade Bradley for Rivers when his potential seemed high during that draft day, why would they trade him for an obvious bust now? And Rivers is absolutely not worth a first round pick. Late round or future. Absolutely not.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #43 on: December 17, 2013, 10:28:08 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7680
  • Tommy Points: 447
They weren't willing to trade Bradley for Rivers when his potential seemed high during that draft day, why would they trade him for an obvious bust now? And Rivers is absolutely not worth a first round pick. Late round or future. Absolutely not.
Yep.  He's a second round kind of guy.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #44 on: December 17, 2013, 10:29:09 AM »

Offline TwinTower14

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1119
  • Tommy Points: 48
Austin Rivers sucks....he will be playing over seas in a few years...