0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: CelticConcourse on June 19, 2013, 02:32:55 PMQuote from: kgainez on June 19, 2013, 02:28:50 PMQuote from: CelticConcourse on June 19, 2013, 02:26:43 PMPierce is light years better than Manu.nopePierce first, Manu secondPoints Per Game18.611.8Rebounds Per Game6.33.4Assists Per Game4.84.6FG%43.642.53P%38.035.3FT%78.779.6STL1.11.3BLK0.40.2TOV2.82.2WS7.24.5You be the judge.Well if you are going to post stats at least get them right. From NBA.com or ESPN.com - PP shot 37% FG and 27% from 3 point. He only averaged 5.7 boards and he averaged over 5 turn overs a game in the NYK series. He had the same problem handling the ball as Manu. They are both getting long in the tooth, and will both be retired in a year or two.
Quote from: kgainez on June 19, 2013, 02:28:50 PMQuote from: CelticConcourse on June 19, 2013, 02:26:43 PMPierce is light years better than Manu.nopePierce first, Manu secondPoints Per Game18.611.8Rebounds Per Game6.33.4Assists Per Game4.84.6FG%43.642.53P%38.035.3FT%78.779.6STL1.11.3BLK0.40.2TOV2.82.2WS7.24.5You be the judge.
Quote from: CelticConcourse on June 19, 2013, 02:26:43 PMPierce is light years better than Manu.nope
Pierce is light years better than Manu.
Quote from: kgainez on June 19, 2013, 01:30:02 AMPaul Pierce = Ginoblisame thingyep. said the same thing last night. The [dang] spurs had it won and leonards missed FT blew it. FT's are sooooooo important.
Paul Pierce = Ginoblisame thing