Rondo has advocated for a smaller playbook in the past. I don't have a link but I know it is true. What Doc is saying here does not make sense to me. Doc is the coach, and he can't blame a "large playbook" on the pg.
Rondo used a single offensive set to obliterate the Knicks in the second half of game 3 in the finals. Consider that each offensive set has 4-5 options, and consider that Doc (the coach by the way) decided to give the celtics over 60 offensive sets this season. Then Doc (the coach of the team) decided to cut this number in half THE DAY before the playoffs began.
In my opinion a good coach would have cut the playbook in half much earlier (the day that "THE TRADE" happened).
In my opinion a good coach would have an offensive playbook much smaller than 60 offensive sets, especially with 4 talented players who can make the most out of even simple pic and roll plays.
I love Doc, but Doc don't pass the buck to the players. Own up to your decisions, and in the future please please listen to Red when he says "keep it simple". Find a couple plays that work, and just stick with them. It's not about how many plays the celtics have, it is how well ALL the players know them, and are able to execute them at break neck speeds.
One last thing, 60 x 4 = 240. If i was running down the court with Dwayne Wade all over me, and thousands of people in the stands watching, and 240 options in my head, and Doc Rivers raspy voice from some random practice in my head.... yeah, confusion might occur.
I love Doc, seems like a nice guy, but don't blame a talented and smart pg
I love Doc, but I'm just being real.