Anyone who thinks we would've been in a different situation if Perk was still here is kidding themselves or holding onto an Ainge grudge that they need to get over.
We are down 3-1 in this series because our big four have underperformed. KG has had one great game out of three.
Rondo has one arm for gods sake- what do you expect?
Lebron and Wade have hit some unbelievable shots and our starters have underperformed- they are old. Their legs couldn't handle the over time and Rondo couldn't help them with one arm and no free throw dependency.
We've been bitten by the injury bug and luckily for us we had a Jermaine Oneal who was arguably much more valuable against a team like the Heat than Perkins would ever have been.
We could well still be losing if we had Perk.
Our chances would be better. I keep hearing people talk about having JO out there as if it's an either/or situation. JO plays about 40% - 50% of the team's center minutes.
Who's playing the other 50%? A lot of those are Baby Davis. How's that working out?
You really don't think that the team defense would be better if we had Perkins out there instead of an ancient Shaq and a useless Baby? Frankly, I think YOU are kidding yourself if you don't think, at the very least, the defense would be significantly improved with Perk still on the roster.
And every complaint about "KG's only had one great game out of four" is even more true about Jeff Green.