« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Down

Author Topic: Ideas for backup SF  (Read 18486 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Ideas for backup SF
« Reply #60 on: February 10, 2011, 12:10:02 PM »

Offline Asijs

  • Josh Minott
  • Posts: 107
  • Tommy Points: 54
Bradley, Nate for Josh Childress?
Logged
Re: Ideas for backup SF
« Reply #61 on: February 10, 2011, 12:15:11 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34128
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Quote from: Asijs on February 10, 2011, 12:10:02 PM
Bradley, Nate for Josh Childress?

Too much money for too many years. 
Logged
Re: Ideas for backup SF
« Reply #62 on: February 10, 2011, 04:17:59 PM »

Offline celts55

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2694
  • Tommy Points: 580
Really! Nobody liked my bring back Bill Walker idea?
Logged
Re: Ideas for backup SF
« Reply #63 on: February 10, 2011, 05:41:46 PM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
It sucks that Danny gave Nate that second year.  While we'll never know, I really feel this was another Scalabrine moment for DA, where he was bidding against himself.  I mean would any other team really have given Nate 2 years at 4.5 million a year?  I think he could've had him for 4.5 million for one year. 

And if he did, I think Nate would really be more desirable to teams, as they could clear cap space this summer.  Plus, moving Nate for a 3 would be the easiest solution for our woes, as Delonte could slide to the 1, Wafer to the 2, and we'd have a new 3. 

But at this point, I'm not sure how many teams are going to want to pay 4.5 million a year to 5-7 shooting guard. 
Logged
Re: Ideas for backup SF
« Reply #64 on: February 10, 2011, 06:52:08 PM »

Offline wiley

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4855
  • Tommy Points: 386
Quote from: Jon on February 10, 2011, 05:41:46 PM
It sucks that Danny gave Nate that second year.  While we'll never know, I really feel this was another Scalabrine moment for DA, where he was bidding against himself.  I mean would any other team really have given Nate 2 years at 4.5 million a year?  I think he could've had him for 4.5 million for one year. 

And if he did, I think Nate would really be more desirable to teams, as they could clear cap space this summer.  Plus, moving Nate for a 3 would be the easiest solution for our woes, as Delonte could slide to the 1, Wafer to the 2, and we'd have a new 3. 

But at this point, I'm not sure how many teams are going to want to pay 4.5 million a year to 5-7 shooting guard. 

Let's see how he does next to Delonte.....if his offense unslumps we'll be happy again...which doesn't negate anything you said....just that it won't hurt anymore as it does now.....I think Danny can grab a SF...
Logged
Re: Ideas for backup SF
« Reply #65 on: February 10, 2011, 08:07:06 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
I'm hoping that Utah falls apart without Sloan, drops a bunch of games  and maybe Kirilenko could request a buy out.
Logged
Re: Ideas for backup SF
« Reply #66 on: February 10, 2011, 08:07:44 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
Quote from: Asijs on February 10, 2011, 12:10:02 PM
Bradley, Nate for Josh Childress?
:o
Logged
Re: Ideas for backup SF
« Reply #67 on: February 11, 2011, 12:30:49 AM »

Offline Adelaide Celt

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1402
  • Tommy Points: 216
So many good bench/borderline starter level small forwards around the league... And so many of them on crap/mediocre teams!

Surely one can be prised loose somehow. Even if Marquis recovers from his current injury, I think the risk and consequence of re-injury is too great to throw him back on the court this season. A replacement must be sought out.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Up
« previous next »