Is Your Pick Two Team Better than When it Started?

[Bahku]

Well, it looks like Who and I fundamentally disagree on Kirilenko.  All-star caliber?  Maybe in the D-League.  

I have enjoyed reading Who's take on the "Pick-Two" teams, but I think some people have come to accept them as "fact" rather than just opinion. My "Pick Two" team, (Denver Nuggets), is considerably better than it exists in reality and has placed either 2nd or 3rd consistently in the simulations, (which I'm not claiming to be an exact science, but is certainly an indication of quality), yet Who is "not a fan of this team" which has a "number of weaknesses". I also agree that my team is heavy on offense, but when your starting five averages over 90 PPG, defense is going to be secondary. As I've stated in a previous post, I agree with maybe 30-40% of Who's opinions, and while they are certainly appreciated and fun to read/analyze, they are still just one person's opinion, and not the know-all, end-all summations that some accept them as. This is not meant as any slander to Who, as he is very knowledgeable about basketball, just that there are others here of a similar level of expertise, and a similar level of fallibility. I value my own opinion, as most people here do, and no matter what perspective I take, I have to say that my Denver Nuggets is a far better team than the analysis provided by Who, (which was also done long before my team was even completed). I thoroughly enjoyed reading Who's interpretations, I just personally have take them with a large grain of salt.