KG is going to be fine. I'm confident that he could have come back sooner, but the team allowed him to get 100% healthy. I think people around here will quickly remember how great the player they're currently underestimating is.
Yup. Agreed. People underestimating KG are nuts.
5 of our losses have come without KG. Another 2 without Pierce. Not surprising that you'd lose games when one (or both) of your two best players are injured.
If anyone needs clarification on the difference between the Celtics WITH KG and the Celtics WITHOUT KG, let me spell it out.
2008 playoffs (with KG) = Champion
2009 playoffs (without KG) = Exit in the 2nd round
2009 Chicago series (without KG) = dead even with the Bulls. 7 game series with multiple overtimes. Essentially a "tossup" on who is better.
October 30th vs Chicago (With KG) = 118-90... Celtics destroy the Bulls.
December 12th vs Chicago (With KG) = 106-80... Celtics destroy the Bulls.
Jan 14th Vs Chicago (without KG) = 83-96... Bulls beat the Celtics.
Seems pretty straight forward to me. CEltics with KG = Contender. Celtics without KG = mediocre.
I've said it multiple times. I don't understand why people can't grasp this... Taking KG off the Celtics is like taking Duncan off the Spurs. You wouldn't expect much from them so why do people expect much from a Garnettless Boston squad?