Anybody think we need an anti-Shaq?

[ToppersBsktball10]

We got Perk and if we resign BBD he did a pretty good job on him this year so we're set.

[PosImpos]

Like everybody else said:

Duh!  We already have an Anti-Shaq.  Perk!

[Who]

Nope, the C's are all set with Perkins and Sheed. If Glen Davis comes back, they get even stronger.

No need for anyone else.

[Prof. Clutch]

i think we'll all need an anti-guaransheed of antibodies from the anti-matter that is released from the atomic explosion of the first meeting of lebron/anti-lebron and shaq/anti-shaq.  call the anti-WHO!

TP for you avatar, one of my favorite moments in sports history was that D Brown, no look, pump up the shoes on those old school pumps he had, dunk.

[LooseCannon]

I agree with others, we need an anti-LeBron,anti-Kobe more. We already have an anti-Shaq in Perk, and BBD. Shaq cannot guard KG or SHeed. We will kill them with pick and roll, pick and pop at the end of games.

A guy that can guard the 2 and 3 off the bench and score a little bit is what we need. Thats why I am NOT on the MAtt BArnes bandwagon. I do think that who ever we bring in will be better on D than they have been in the past. Look at RA and even PP and ho wmuch better they have been on D the last two seasons.

Daniels, Moon, Posey, Outlaw....give me one in a S&T.

A guy who can guard Kobe and Lebron and who can score a little would be starting somewhere in the NBA, not sitting on someone's bench.

The Celtics might be better served looking for someone who can score some by driving to the basket and who is an adequate but not spectacular defender can be taught team D.  For their budget, this player will probably have one or more liabilities, most likely age, injury history, foul-prone, or undersized.

[FLCeltsFan]

We have an anti-Shaq... His name is Perk.