If I had a choice of Howard or Perk on this team especially if KG was playing...no question I'd take Perk. Howard is not a good man defender. Perk has hit turnarounds, drop steps, 8-foot jumpers and baby hooks on him this entire series. Howard has done none of this on Perk. Every single one of his makes on the offensive end is on offensive rebounds, fast breaks, or a teammate dumping off the ball on him. Perk is not going to demand the ball which would tear apart the team chemistry. Perk is no slouch himself on help defense, in fact you could make the case that he is a better help defender in terms of being where he is supposed to be when the initial perimeter defense breaks down. If I were starting a team with different players then yes I'd take Howard, I'm not naive to think that Howard couldn't develop into a more efficient player, but for this team for me its a no-brainer. Perk knows his role and accepts it. Perk right now is fundamentally more skilled, more intelligent, and a better team player than Howard is. So yes, I wouldn't trade Perk for Howard straight up if my goal is to win a championship with the current players (including KG) right now. I can't imagine, in light of Howard's recent comments, that any Celtic would trade Perk for Howard if it were their call.