Draymond Says He Was Repeatedly Called N-Word During NBA Finals

[gouki88]

I disagree with your premise. Lack of audio evidence doesn’t mean he’s lying. I’m not sure what should/shouldn’t be recorded. I’ve never worked as a camera guy, but I’d imagine that they are selective in what they record. I know they are selective in what they broadcast. I also don’t record Celtics games while I’m there so I haven’t caught anyone in the act. This is me attempting to answer your question.

Are the other men lying as well, because there’s no audio?

Your attempts to make all these scenarios equivalent is lazy

Huh? Guy said he was called a bad word and white Celtics fans get super defensive. Pretty standard response to most of these accounts.

Another lazy post. Try harder

[BASS_THUMPER]

I disagree with your premise. Lack of audio evidence doesn’t mean he’s lying. I’m not sure what should/shouldn’t be recorded. I’ve never worked as a camera guy, but I’d imagine that they are selective in what they record. I know they are selective in what they broadcast. I also don’t record Celtics games while I’m there so I haven’t caught anyone in the act. This is me attempting to answer your question.

Are the other men lying as well, because there’s no audio?

Your attempts to make all these scenarios equivalent is lazy

Huh? Guy said he was called a bad word and white Celtics fans get super defensive. Pretty standard response to most of these accounts.

Another lazy post. Try harder

*sippin*

[MarcusSmartFanClub]

I disagree with your premise. Lack of audio evidence doesn’t mean he’s lying. I’m not sure what should/shouldn’t be recorded. I’ve never worked as a camera guy, but I’d imagine that they are selective in what they record. I know they are selective in what they broadcast. I also don’t record Celtics games while I’m there so I haven’t caught anyone in the act. This is me attempting to answer your question.

Are the other men lying as well, because there’s no audio?

Your attempts to make all these scenarios equivalent is lazy

Huh? Guy said he was called a bad word and white Celtics fans get super defensive. Pretty standard response to most of these accounts.

Another lazy post. Try harder

Try harder at what? I don’t know what you mean. Have you added anything to this, or are you just into calling things lazy? Seems ironic to me.

What is your take?

[gouki88]

I disagree with your premise. Lack of audio evidence doesn’t mean he’s lying. I’m not sure what should/shouldn’t be recorded. I’ve never worked as a camera guy, but I’d imagine that they are selective in what they record. I know they are selective in what they broadcast. I also don’t record Celtics games while I’m there so I haven’t caught anyone in the act. This is me attempting to answer your question.

Are the other men lying as well, because there’s no audio?

Your attempts to make all these scenarios equivalent is lazy

Huh? Guy said he was called a bad word and white Celtics fans get super defensive. Pretty standard response to most of these accounts.

Another lazy post. Try harder

Try harder at what? I don’t know what you mean. Have you added anything to this, or are you just into calling things lazy? Seems ironic to me.

What is your take?

You can find my take earlier. I find it very hard to believe that Draymond would sit on this for so long, or that Celtics players (several of whom are very outspoken antiracists) would have not heard this "repeated" incident.

Trying to compare this to other examples is just silly. This has nothing in common with Smart's encounter in his car, for example

[MarcusSmartFanClub]

I disagree with your premise. Lack of audio evidence doesn’t mean he’s lying. I’m not sure what should/shouldn’t be recorded. I’ve never worked as a camera guy, but I’d imagine that they are selective in what they record. I know they are selective in what they broadcast. I also don’t record Celtics games while I’m there so I haven’t caught anyone in the act. This is me attempting to answer your question.

Are the other men lying as well, because there’s no audio?

Your attempts to make all these scenarios equivalent is lazy

Huh? Guy said he was called a bad word and white Celtics fans get super defensive. Pretty standard response to most of these accounts.

Another lazy post. Try harder

Try harder at what? I don’t know what you mean. Have you added anything to this, or are you just into calling things lazy? Seems ironic to me.

What is your take?

You can find my take earlier. I find it very hard to believe that Draymond would sit on this for so long, or that Celtics players (several of whom are very outspoken antiracists) would have not heard this "repeated" incident.

Trying to compare this to other examples is just silly. This has nothing in common with Smart's encounter in his car, for example

Ah I see, you didn’t see my post about Marcus earlier where I posted this: https://www.boston.com/sports/boston-celtics/2021/05/27/marcus-smart-racist-comments-td-garden/

Roy turned this into talking about the woman outside of the Garden and the incident at OK state. I’m referring to this:

“I’ve heard a couple of them,” Smart said. “It’s kind of sad and sickening. Even though it’s an opposing team, we’ve had guys on your home team that you’re saying these racial slurs and you expect us to go out here and play for you. It’s tough.

“We just want everyone to be respectful, on and off the court. We want that same respect that we give to fans and the crowd to come out here and put on a good show and not to interfere in that type of manner with them. We expect the same in return from us.”

[JSD]

Your perspectives are akin to a disorienting journey through the convoluted and illogical realm of woke Twitter. It's as unhelpful as using examples of high-profile hoaxes like Jussie Smollett to argue a point. We should focus on the facts of this specific incident alone. It is not productive to continue to focus on and argue about this specific issue, as it is a losing battle for you. Instead, you are choosing to divert attention to other incidents as a distracting technique. However, this tactic will not be successful as it is easily recognized.

[MarcusSmartFanClub]

Your perspectives are akin to a disorienting journey through the convoluted and illogical realm of woke Twitter. It's as unhelpful as using examples of high-profile hoaxes like Jussie Smollett to argue a point. We should focus on the facts of this specific incident alone. It is not productive to continue to focus on and argue about this specific issue, as it is a losing battle for you. Instead, you are choosing to divert attention to other incidents as a distracting technique. However, this tactic will not be successful as it is easily recognized.

I guess I’m the only one here that has heard the N word at the Garden. Maybe it was the F word that I heard.

[Roy H.]

Your perspectives are akin to a disorienting journey through the convoluted and illogical realm of woke Twitter. It's as unhelpful as using examples of high-profile hoaxes like Jussie Smollett to argue a point. We should focus on the facts of this specific incident alone. It is not productive to continue to focus on and argue about this specific issue, as it is a losing battle for you. Instead, you are choosing to divert attention to other incidents as a distracting technique. However, this tactic will not be successful as it is easily recognized.

I guess I’m the only one here that has heard the N word at the Garden. Maybe it was the F word that I heard.

It doesn’t surprise me, because you have already admitted you chill with people who use that word. Did it come from your friend group?

Otherwise, shame on you and the people around you for not reporting it.