I'm not sure that's true. I had looked at the rough numbers, and I think we'll end up in the same place we are now: above the first apron, below the second apron.
As a practical matter I'm not sure that it makes a gigantic difference.
I think this is likely the case. Things don't really explode until Tatum gets his new contract, likely starting in 2025-26 (he does have a player option, but there is little chance he picks that up). Brown is going to bump up next season over this season by about $20M but hopefully that can be absorbed by a 10% increase in the caps/aprons. Otherwise, most everyone else that matters is signed with no significant increases. Pritchard will be a RFA if he is still around, Kornet a UFA, Champagnie a RFA, all pretty easily replaceable players with draft picks, "promoted" 2-ways, or FAs. I don't think we have any purely cap reason forcing us to trade Brogdon but I think he has some value, as evidenced by the near LAC trade. I would be pretty happy to just go with this core team, including Brogdon, for 2 seasons. I don't feel that Brogdon is "on the block", I am sure he is not "untouchable" either though.
In 2025-26, Tatum is going to get a deal that will make Brown's look like a bargain. Also, White, Brogdon, and Horford all become UFAs. That is the point where things get tough. Resigning some or all of these players will likely push us over the aprons. Even if we replace them with FAs and rookies, we will likely be over just based on Tatum's increase. The following season (2026-27), RWill and Porzingis come due. That is 2-3 seasons away though. I am not going to start worrying about that just yet. Way to many variables that could change.