Author Topic: ESPN treatment of the chicks' league  (Read 8841 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ESPN treatment of the chicks' league
« on: July 08, 2019, 10:40:03 AM »

Offline trickybilly

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5446
  • Tommy Points: 609
No write ups on the ESPN app of games. Like a Edited.  Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline.ing intern could pull something together. Its just shortsighted. Why are sports companies stupid?
"Gimme the ball, gimme the ball". Freddy Quimby, 1994.

Re: ESPN treatment of the chicks' league
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2019, 10:53:19 AM »

Offline Jiri Welsch

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2935
  • Tommy Points: 349
Simultaneously using the term "chicks' league" and critiquing ESPN for not covering the WNBA is very funny to me.

Re: ESPN treatment of the chicks' league
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2019, 10:56:06 AM »

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619
Simultaneously using the term "chicks' league" and critiquing ESPN for not covering the WNBA is very funny to me.

Yeah, I don’t even know how to react to that post.

Re: ESPN treatment of the chicks' league
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2019, 10:59:06 AM »

Offline Surferdad

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13687
  • Tommy Points: 912
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Maybe the OP should read the New York Times.  It's much more of a chicks' newspaper.

Re: ESPN treatment of the chicks' league
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2019, 11:02:21 AM »

Offline Moranis

  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31683
  • Tommy Points: 1470
I'm just going to lock this thread now.  If you would like to start a new one that isn't quite so offensive.  You can try.
I was finally wrong. Boston not only didn't win in 5, but didn't win at all.