Author Topic: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19  (Read 77289 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #285 on: February 12, 2019, 09:13:43 PM »

Offline celtics4ever33

  • NGT
  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 306
  • Tommy Points: 16
Can we just cut Rozier now

+14 Rozier

-2 Smart
+/- is so dependent on factors outside of one players control that it's pretty useless to compare individual players with it. What's your point?

+14 Rozier , Smart -2

Yet everyone drilling Rozier, i dont even like Rozier much , it just funny how hes lambasted on every detail

Smart can miss , turn it over, not one peep.

+ / - means nothing except the fact that its the reason Smart is playing, he is 256+ which is 2nd on the team, which means when he is in , at the very least the team plays well.

So yea, why not bring it up when he is a -2 and Rozier is a +14, but getting killed like he is losing the game. A game they are winning against the Sixers.

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #286 on: February 12, 2019, 09:14:07 PM »

Offline blink

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19662
  • Tommy Points: 1622
I liked our def effort for most of the 1/2.  We didn't let Embiid or JJ get going.  Al with some great def on Embiid, and multiple guys making JJ work.

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #287 on: February 12, 2019, 09:14:16 PM »

Offline Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37058
  • Tommy Points: 3377
  • On To Banner 19!
Good News: We actually won a 2nd quarter!

Bad News: Here comes that dreaded 3rd...  :(
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #288 on: February 12, 2019, 09:14:18 PM »

Offline esel1000

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11547
  • Tommy Points: 587
Mook and kyrie are right!  The problem are the [dang] kids!  Not a one of them Tatum, Brown, or Rozier for all the accolades they got last year are worth a dam tonight.  When they buy in, this team will be great.  Their chance to shine and turrible.

As a vet I can imagine it being super frustrating to have a bunch of kids thinking they’re hot ish and entitled because they made noise in the weak EC playoffs last year. I’m not surprised Mook is frustrated.

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #289 on: February 12, 2019, 09:14:43 PM »

Offline celtics4ever33

  • NGT
  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 306
  • Tommy Points: 16
Can we just cut Rozier now

+14 Rozier

-2 Smart
+/- is so dependent on factors outside of one players control that it's pretty useless to compare individual players with it. What's your point?

Stats dont mean **** when the guy sucks.  Might as well wipe your butt with them

Same way I wipe my butt with Marcus Smart's 3 point %

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #290 on: February 12, 2019, 09:15:24 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25486
  • Tommy Points: 2719
I'm not the biggest TR fan but I definitely think more of him than what seems the consensus here.  He's taken all of 3 shots tonight -- missed them, but he isn't taking many.  1 TO; 1 Steal; 4 assists and 2 boards. 

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #291 on: February 12, 2019, 09:15:28 PM »

Offline RJ87

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11954
  • Tommy Points: 1431
  • Let's Go Celtics!
Can we just cut Rozier now

+14 Rozier

-2 Smart
+/- is so dependent on factors outside of one players control that it's pretty useless to compare individual players with it. What's your point?

+14 Rozier , Smart -2

Yet everyone drilling Rozier, i dont even like Rozier much , it just funny how hes lambasted on every detail

Smart can miss , turn it over, not one peep.

+ / - means nothing except the fact that its the reason Smart is playing, he is 256+ which is 2nd on the team, which means when he is in , at the very least the team plays well.

So yea, why not bring it up when he is a -2 and Rozier is a +14, but getting killed like he is losing the game. A game they are winning against the Sixers.

Didn't you start the "Rozier is a 'winner'" thread??
2021 Houston Rockets
PG: Kyrie Irving/Patty Mills/Jalen Brunson
SG: OG Anunoby/Norman Powell/Matisse Thybulle
SF: Gordon Hayward/Demar Derozan
PF: Giannis Antetokounmpo/Robert Covington
C: Kristaps Porzingis/Bobby Portis/James Wiseman

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #292 on: February 12, 2019, 09:15:44 PM »

Offline esel1000

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11547
  • Tommy Points: 587
Can we just cut Rozier now

+14 Rozier

-2 Smart
+/- is so dependent on factors outside of one players control that it's pretty useless to compare individual players with it. What's your point?

+14 Rozier , Smart -2

Yet everyone drilling Rozier, i dont even like Rozier much , it just funny how hes lambasted on every detail

Smart can miss , turn it over, not one peep.

+ / - means nothing except the fact that its the reason Smart is playing, he is 256+ which is 2nd on the team, which means when he is in , at the very least the team plays well.

So yea, why not bring it up when he is a -2 and Rozier is a +14, but getting killed like he is losing the game. A game they are winning against the Sixers.

Rozier has games where he contributes. However more often than not he’s a net negative on both ends. Smart can go 0-20 and contribute to winning with his defensive intensity and hustle. That’s the difference.

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #293 on: February 12, 2019, 09:16:33 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45916
  • Tommy Points: 3340
Can we just cut Rozier now

+14 Rozier

-2 Smart
+/- is so dependent on factors outside of one players control that it's pretty useless to compare individual players with it. What's your point?

+14 Rozier , Smart -2

Yet everyone drilling Rozier, i dont even like Rozier much , it just funny how hes lambasted on every detail

Smart can miss , turn it over, not one peep.

+ / - means nothing except the fact that its the reason Smart is playing, he is 256+ which is 2nd on the team, which means when he is in , at the very least the team plays well.

So yea, why not bring it up when he is a -2 and Rozier is a +14, but getting killed like he is losing the game. A game they are winning against the Sixers.

I hate Rozier but other than shooting and that end of the half play he's played decently. He had some nice passes and some tough rebounds....

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #294 on: February 12, 2019, 09:16:45 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Can we just cut Rozier now

+14 Rozier

-2 Smart
+/- is so dependent on factors outside of one players control that it's pretty useless to compare individual players with it. What's your point?

+14 Rozier , Smart -2

Yet everyone drilling Rozier, i dont even like Rozier much , it just funny how hes lambasted on every detail

Smart can miss , turn it over, not one peep.

+ / - means nothing except the fact that its the reason Smart is playing, he is 256+ which is 2nd on the team, which means when he is in , at the very least the team plays well.

So yea, why not bring it up when he is a -2 and Rozier is a +14, but getting killed like he is losing the game. A game they are winning against the Sixers.
I don't get it though. Smart was getting scorched for his stupid shots. Rozier wasn getting scorched for his inability to hit shots and bad defence
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #295 on: February 12, 2019, 09:17:31 PM »

Offline tstorey_97

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3667
  • Tommy Points: 586
Looks just like May 5, 2018 in Philly (game 2?) went into OT
Horford, Tatum, Brown and Rozier carried them

101-98

Tough game tonight, gotta get tougher. Been beating on Embid pretty good.

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #296 on: February 12, 2019, 09:18:07 PM »

Offline celtics4ever33

  • NGT
  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 306
  • Tommy Points: 16
Can we just cut Rozier now

+14 Rozier

-2 Smart
+/- is so dependent on factors outside of one players control that it's pretty useless to compare individual players with it. What's your point?

+14 Rozier , Smart -2

Yet everyone drilling Rozier, i dont even like Rozier much , it just funny how hes lambasted on every detail

Smart can miss , turn it over, not one peep.

+ / - means nothing except the fact that its the reason Smart is playing, he is 256+ which is 2nd on the team, which means when he is in , at the very least the team plays well.

So yea, why not bring it up when he is a -2 and Rozier is a +14, but getting killed like he is losing the game. A game they are winning against the Sixers.

Rozier has games where he contributes. However more often than not he’s a net negative on both ends. Smart can go 0-20 and contribute to winning with his defensive intensity and hustle. That’s the difference.

When you say 0-20 and still contribute it sounds funny because in essence he is doing just that, and going 0-20 would lose you a game.

Smart has been amazing this year, the team plays so much better when he is in, but he misses shots that a Danny Green or any three point shooter would make....hes killed the Celtics multiple times by missing wide wide open shots that he will be getting for the rest of his life. Nobody pays attention to him much when Irving is in.

This is why I hope he can make them in the playoffs

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #297 on: February 12, 2019, 09:18:10 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8706
  • Tommy Points: 851
Need more from Smart tonight.

I'd also like to see Hayward get more minutes, he was aggressive and is a good facilitator if we let him go.

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #298 on: February 12, 2019, 09:18:13 PM »

Offline cltc5

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7176
  • Tommy Points: 463
Can we just cut Rozier now

+14 Rozier

-2 Smart
+/- is so dependent on factors outside of one players control that it's pretty useless to compare individual players with it. What's your point?

+14 Rozier , Smart -2

Yet everyone drilling Rozier, i dont even like Rozier much , it just funny how hes lambasted on every detail

Smart can miss , turn it over, not one peep.

+ / - means nothing except the fact that its the reason Smart is playing, he is 256+ which is 2nd on the team, which means when he is in , at the very least the team plays well.

So yea, why not bring it up when he is a -2 and Rozier is a +14, but getting killed like he is losing the game. A game they are winning against the Sixers.

Rozier has games where he contributes. However more often than not he’s a net negative on both ends. Smart can go 0-20 and contribute to winning with his defensive intensity and hustle. That’s the difference.

This.  Smart does a lot of little things good.  If Rozier isn’t hitting he’s junk

Re: Celtics (35-21) at Sixers (36-20) Game #57 2/12/19
« Reply #299 on: February 12, 2019, 09:19:04 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Does anyone really know what Players Only hosts are even talking about half the time? It went from Embiid to Baron Davis' beard in a heartbeat
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)