What larger issue, though? That career criminals end up in jail?
On March 14, the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office filed a response to Meek’s petitions, stating “there is a strong showing of likelihood of the Petitioner’s conviction being reversed (in whole or in part).” The D.A. cited testimony from an officer whose prior testimony against corrupt cops resulted in hundreds of conviction reversals.
Corrupt cops. The original arrest apparently should not have gone down the way it did. I'm definitely not going to die on the "Meek Mill is Innocent of All Crimes!" hill. But he's a famous person who was arrested by a corrupt cop. I'm sure the corruption of law enforcement has impacted thousands of people in Philadelphia.
Right. There’s no evidence the corrupt cop did anything improper in this case, though, nor was the cop involved in his various other crimes.
In the above quote I provided, the DA acknowledges that "there is a strong showing of likelihood of the Petitioner's conviction being reversed (in whole or in part)." It seems strange that the District Attorney's Office would make such a claim based on "no evidence" whatsoever.
Either way, it doesn't seem worth parsing out any more. The reason people care about this situation is twofold:
(1) He's famous
(2) There is a history of corruption in law enforcement in Philadelphia (and elsewhere) that some feel warrants attention and fixing.
It seems like you're having trouble separating the corruption of law enforcement with the guy's questionable behavior generally.
No, they’re two separate issues.
Philly has a bunch of corrupt cops. They are being disciplined, and a lot of guilty defendants are getting a literal get out of jail free card. Any case associated with a dirty cop is immediately suspect.
In Meek Mill’s case, he’s just a scum bag. He’s treated like a hero, when he’s really just a low-grade thug.