« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Is this the biggest team we've had since 2010? Size at every position if needed.  (Read 923 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Is this the biggest team we've had since 2010? Size at every position if needed.
« on: July 31, 2017, 02:51:31 PM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7483
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
Particularly when we are trying to protect leads with a defensive unit out there.

Marcus/Hayward at PG
Hayward/Brown at SG
Hayward/Jae/Brown/ Tatum at SF/Semi
Morris/Jae/ Brown/ Tatum/Hayward/Semi
Horford/Baynes

Shortest guy is Smart at 6'3"+ built like mack truck. Semi is 6'7" similar build.
Rest are 6'8 +.

This is the team with the most size we've had in a while.
We are going to be physical, defensively versatile team of bruisers at all positions when required. A luxury we arguably havent had since Perk left.
Logged
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.
Re: Is this the biggest team we've had since 2010? Size at every position if needed.
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2017, 03:14:57 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Still pretty small at PF, if you are going by traditional positions. And IT is still going to be out there during the most important parts of the game, so maybe not.
Logged
Re: Is this the biggest team we've had since 2010? Size at every position if needed.
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2017, 06:29:51 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15245
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
I thought about starting a thread about this but just not enough to go on.  It seems the team has more length, but not necessarily more size. Hayward at 6'8" would be a tall SG and Tatum at 6'8" at SF would be pretty tall, but he's still has to put on muscle. However, the beauty of this roster is being able to switch everything with their versatility so these guys won't necessarily play those positions.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »