Author Topic: ESPN: Kyrie no longer wants to play w/ Lebron = reason for request. trade soon?  (Read 23153 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #90 on: July 24, 2017, 09:50:54 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37790
  • Tommy Points: 3030
not if it includes any of Brown, Smart or Tatum.

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #91 on: July 24, 2017, 09:55:53 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
These trade ideas make me want to throw up.

Massive pass.
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #92 on: July 24, 2017, 09:56:49 PM »

Offline byennie

  • Webmaster
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2615
  • Tommy Points: 3047

If you can cast physical attributes asidie, then from a pure statistics and skill point of view, I do not consider Kyrie to be a significant upgrade (if at all) over Thomas.

Unfortunately in the NBA however you cannot cast aside physical attributes, because they play a major part in determining how matchups are played out.  As amazing as Thomas is as a player, his size is a major, major liability much of the time he is on the court.

We all saw how Washington and Cleveland picked on Thomas - throwing bigger guards on him and posting him up every time, forcing mismatches and killing us almost every time.  It takes a huge amount of extra effort from everybody on the team to help out and cover those mismatches, which makes it harder for those guys to keep on top of their own man.

I feel like Crowder and Bradley both dropped off defensively this year, and I would imagine a lot of that probably has to do with them constantly having to cover for Thomas now that opposing teams have been trying to force mismatches on him more than ever.

Last I checked I believe that Isaiah Thomas does have the worst (or second worst) defensive RPM among all NBA guards, and despite having one of the best offensive RPM's his overall net RPM is still barely positive.  That's the reality of IT. 

IT averaged 29 PPG last year, and the truth of the matter is that you pretty much NEED him to score 29+ points just to make up for his defensive limitations.  If IT goes out and "only" gives you 25 or 26 points, then he's a liability.

That sounds extreme, but it's true.

Kyrie by comparison is also a shoddy defensive player, but nowhere near AS shoddy as Thomas is.  At 6'3" - 6'4" he at least has the size to put up some kind of defensive resistance against opposing point guards.  Guys can't easily just post him up or shoot straight over the top of him the way they can with Thomas.  You can't just build an entire gameplan based around exploiting Kyrie's defense they way you can with Thomas. 

It's no accident that Boston became tougher for Cleveland to beat after Thomas went down.  It's not because Thomas isn't a great player, it's because it became so much more difficult for Cleveland to exploit any one matchup when we had Smart out here instead of Thomas. 

I think that if we trade Thomas for Kyrie we immediately become better - a lot better.  Not because Kyrie is a better player, just because that larger duo of Kyrie / Gordon would give us one of the bigger and most offensively potent backcourts in the NBA - one that could legitimately give Steph and Klay just as many nightmares as they would give us.  And with both guys being in the 25/26 range, both guys are young enough to stick around while we develop Tatum (who I think sill be a bonafide All-Star) - while Thomas (turning around 28 this year) will be getting into his 30s by the time Tatum is in his 3rd year.

Theoretically, IT is worse in certain matchups, but I think you're cherry picking advanced stats. If what you are saying is true in general, then the numbers should show it somewhere.

IT had an overall BPM that doubled Irving's last year. They had the same defensive rating. IT beats him in win shares by over 30%. Beats him handily in VORP. DBPM is -2.3 to -3.3 (in Irving's favor) but it's made up easily on the offensive end.

Maybe IT has a more extreme offense-to-defense swing, but I don't see how you can say the guy with the clear worse net results is going to improve our team right away.

Your argument about matching up better with Golden State makes no sense to me. How is Kyrie/Hayward more potent than IT/Hayward when IT is clearly the better offensive player? When IT/Bradley is the only duo in the league that beat those guys on the road twice in the last 2 years, how can you conclude swapping out IT for a different PG that can't defend is an upgrade? Just because he's a little taller?

Age is an issue, sure, but immediately better? Not clear at all, and again that's ignoring us giving up something like else like Crowder this year, and a top-5 draft pick on a rookie deal over the next 5 years.

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #93 on: July 24, 2017, 10:00:28 PM »

Offline rocknrollforyoursoul

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10152
  • Tommy Points: 347
Quote
One is still unstoppable when you get to the playoffs and face Bradley-like defending. One gets shut down with good coaching and defending come playoff time.

I was literally just about to post the same thing. While they're equal offensive players in the regular season, in the playoffs Isaiah is shutdownable/houndable.

People seem to be forgetting that Kyrie had LeBron--aka The Greatest Player in the World--to help him out, while IT's biggest offensive "help" was Avery Bradley. Teams won't be shutting down IT with Hayward around.
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.'

You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body.

C.S. Lewis

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #94 on: July 24, 2017, 10:01:36 PM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
Quote
Age is about the only thing I can agree with.

The difference in current hip health and the different lengths of contract are also facts you have no choice but to agree with.

I agree with their existence, but not the value some are putting on them.

Kyrie has 2 years / $40M and a player option. Player options are in the player's favor, obviously. He's only opting in if things go badly. If we re-sign him figure on $30M/year.

IT has 1 year / $6M. If we re-sign him, figure on $30M/year.

Pick any time frame beyond 1 year, and IT costs less. The only time he's more expensive is next year, outside of salary cap fluctuations and year-to-year increases inside of a contract.

As for health, there's no clear advantage to Kyrie. IT had one injury that didn't require surgery. He just couldn't keep playing. IT has averaged 74 games played the last 6 years. Kyrie has averaged 64.

It's not even clear that Kyrie makes us better in the short term, if healthy. if we had to part with Crowder in the deal. Nevermind that he appears to be a locker room cancer and a dimwitted Flat Earth believer that is bailing on a team he won a title with. Pass.

I don't see any evidence (and never have) to indicate that Kyrie is al locker room cancer.  I feel this is one of those lovely buzz words that people just throw at everybody these days. Any time we don't like somebody, just call them a locker room cancer.

Kyrie asks for a trade - he's a locker room cancer.

What about after Crowder practically dared Boston to trade him when fans cheered Hayward during that one game?  Guess Crowder is a locker room cancer too, better trade him.

Up until now I've never heard of anybody else having issues with Kyrie.

Hell before Isaiah came to Boston people used to view him as a ball hog iso guy and a team cancer. 

I will personally guarantee you Kyrie would make us better.  I'd put $10 on it right now that if we traded for Kyrie, we'd be a better team.  If it happens and I am wrong, send me your Paypal details and I will transfer you $10 USD quite happily.

Isaiah Thomas is THE biggest defensive liability in the entire NBA.  Worse then Kyrie Irving.  Worse then Enes Kanter.  Worse then Jahlil Okafor. It took two of the top defenders in the NBA (Bradley and Crowder) last year constantly covering for his limitations, just for us to be as competitive as we were. 

There were times it was borderline painful being a Boston fan during parts of that playoff run, and watching apposing team pick on Isaiah defensively as if he was a first grade kid playing against adults.  It was painful because watching it made me want to BEG for Brad to take him out and let the torture stop, but at the same time I knew darn well that if did pull him out we'd never have enough offense to win the game - so it was a lose/lose situation very time.  Take him out and we don't have enough offense, leave him in and we get punished on defense.

What Thomas does at his size, in a league dominated by size, is amazing - and I have the greatest amount of respect for his fire, his passion, his clear desire to win and be great.  But there are a lot of sports commentators out there who believe that Boston will never be able to win a title as long as their best player is a 5'9" PG, and I have to say that watching some of those games last season make me start to believe that.  Thomas can't consistently outplay Kyrie 1-on-1.  He can't consistently outplay Steph Curry 1-on1.  Not in a 7 game series, those guys are just too big for him and will win the matchup most nights.  There isn't much you can do about that. 

 

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #95 on: July 24, 2017, 10:01:51 PM »

Offline BigDogPitbull

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 405
  • Tommy Points: 29
Kyrie is better than IT.  Considerably better.  I wouldn't include the nets pick but i would include the Lakers pick all day.

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #96 on: July 24, 2017, 10:05:21 PM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
Quote
One is still unstoppable when you get to the playoffs and face Bradley-like defending. One gets shut down with good coaching and defending come playoff time.

I was literally just about to post the same thing. While they're equal offensive players in the regular season, in the playoffs Isaiah is shutdownable/houndable.

People seem to be forgetting that Kyrie had LeBron--aka The Greatest Player in the World--to help him out, while IT's biggest offensive "help" was Avery Bradley. Teams won't be shutting down IT with Hayward around.

You do realize that IT played with Demarcus Cousins in Sacramento, right? And he didn't look nearly as good doing it as Kyrie has looked being second fiddle to Lebron. 

Sure Cousins is no Lebron James, but he's still the best center in the game (arguably the best big man in the game, period).

And to me its not about shutting down IT, it's just about SLOWING down IT.  All you need to do is make sure he doesn't go off for 30+ and you're fine.  His defense is such a problem that for him to be a net positive, he needs to give you 29 points.  If you can slow him down enough to limit him to "only" 27 points, then he becomes an overall liability.

It's really only when he's exploding for those big  31+ point games that his offensive becomes significant enough to overcome his defensive, and at that point he really becomes a threat.

It's very hard for a 5'9" guy to go out and give you 28-29 points every single night, especially in the playoffs.  That's a difficult thing for a team to have to depend on getting night in, night out, for the next 3-4 years.  It's going to be even harder to expect that once Thomas reaches his 30s and slows down a step or two, because at that point his defense will get even worse then it already is - at least now he has quickness and athleticism on his side.

Kyie, due to his size, isn't likely to decline nearly as quickly as Thomas.  While Thomas is largely dependent on his quickness and explosiveness to get his shots off, Irving is more dependant on his size and skills - he's more like a 6'3" PG version of Carmelo.  Even as he reaches up in to his 30's he should still be able to utilize his size, ball handling and shooting skills to remain effective (e.g. Jamaal Crawford) while IT's game is likely going to fall off a cliff once he reaches 30-31 and starts to lose his athleticism.

That whole "drop off" of IT and Horford is something that I am very seriously concerned about right now.  This team as it stands only looks to have maybe 3 years of true competitiveness in it before the games of both Thomas and Horford fall off a cliff in the most dramatic way.  In 3 years IT will be around 31 years old and Horford will be around 34. You're not getting much out of those guys by that point, so you're basically resting all of your hopes on Gordon Hayward and a handful of prospects to develop and carry that team through the future.

Getting Kyrie makes our future outlook much more favorable in the long term.  Three years from now he'll still only be 28 years old - the same age Thomas is right now.  By then Brown will be 25, Tatum will be 24 (both should be starting to come in to their own), Hayward will be around 29.  That's a good core.
« Last Edit: July 24, 2017, 10:20:16 PM by crimson_stallion »

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #97 on: July 24, 2017, 10:08:23 PM »

Offline Scintan

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3066
  • Tommy Points: 656
IT and Irving are pretty much the same player...

Then why even think about such a trade?


When people are free to do as they please, they usually imitate each other.

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #98 on: July 24, 2017, 10:10:23 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Kyrie is better than IT.  Considerably better.  I wouldn't include the nets pick but i would include the Lakers pick all day.
How is he considerably better? Is it because his dribble moves are more dazzling, or is there any actual substance when people say this?
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #99 on: July 24, 2017, 10:53:38 PM »

Offline Rosco917

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6108
  • Tommy Points: 559
Kyrie while not being a good defender, or even a fair defender, still is a more useful defender than IT.
Kyrie can hold his own at times, while Thomas needs immediate help when put under defensive pressure. This type of necessary help can be very tiring on a defense.

On the offensive end of the court, we all know what IT can do, he is quite comfortable being the man, he's happy to have the weight of the team on his shoulders. Both players hand out assists when necessary, or as a last resort. IT is also a fine and likable team leader. That counts in my book.

While Kyrie has been shielded by LeBron for the past years, only shinning when given the green light by James. We've never watched Irving be the alpha dog, on a team without LBJ on it. I'm sure he's ready for the job, but still kind of unknown how he'll handle the job. I have a feeling he's not a great team leader, (more of a personal feeling.)

I'll take a healthy IT, over Kyrie.



Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #100 on: July 24, 2017, 11:02:02 PM »

Offline chiken Green

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 608
  • Tommy Points: 75
Quote
One is still unstoppable when you get to the playoffs and face Bradley-like defending. One gets shut down with good coaching and defending come playoff time.

I was literally just about to post the same thing. While they're equal offensive players in the regular season, in the playoffs Isaiah is shutdownable/houndable.

Are you guys seriously going to ignore the fact that Lebron was on court with the "unstoppable" Irving? 

IT was the only Real offensive option when he was "Stopped."   (Sully was trash, Turner was struggling, Bradly and Crowder were both dealing with injuries)

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #101 on: July 24, 2017, 11:13:32 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Kyrie while not being a good defender, or even a fair defender, still is a more useful defender than IT.
Kyrie can hold his own at times, while Thomas needs immediate help when put under defensive pressure. This type of necessary help can be very tiring on a defense.

On the offensive end of the court, we all know what IT can do, he is quite comfortable being the man, he's happy to have the weight of the team on his shoulders. Both players hand out assists when necessary, or as a last resort. IT is also a fine and likable team leader. That counts in my book.

While Kyrie has been shielded by LeBron for the past years, only shinning when given the green light by James. We've never watched Irving be the alpha dog, on a team without LBJ on it. I'm sure he's ready for the job, but still kind of unknown how he'll handle the job. I have a feeling he's not a great team leader, (more of a personal feeling.)

I'll take a healthy IT, over Kyrie.
Well said, TP.

Another important thing to note is Kyrie is considerably less durable than IT.
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #102 on: July 24, 2017, 11:39:38 PM »

Offline byennie

  • Webmaster
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2615
  • Tommy Points: 3047
I don't see any evidence (and never have) to indicate that Kyrie is al locker room cancer.  I feel this is one of those lovely buzz words that people just throw at everybody these days. Any time we don't like somebody, just call them a locker room cancer.

Kyrie asks for a trade - he's a locker room cancer.

What about after Crowder practically dared Boston to trade him when fans cheered Hayward during that one game?  Guess Crowder is a locker room cancer too, better trade him.

Up until now I've never heard of anybody else having issues with Kyrie.

Hell before Isaiah came to Boston people used to view him as a ball hog iso guy and a team cancer. 

I will personally guarantee you Kyrie would make us better.  I'd put $10 on it right now that if we traded for Kyrie, we'd be a better team.  If it happens and I am wrong, send me your Paypal details and I will transfer you $10 USD quite happily.

Isaiah Thomas is THE biggest defensive liability in the entire NBA.  Worse then Kyrie Irving.  Worse then Enes Kanter.  Worse then Jahlil Okafor. It took two of the top defenders in the NBA (Bradley and Crowder) last year constantly covering for his limitations, just for us to be as competitive as we were. 

There were times it was borderline painful being a Boston fan during parts of that playoff run, and watching apposing team pick on Isaiah defensively as if he was a first grade kid playing against adults.  It was painful because watching it made me want to BEG for Brad to take him out and let the torture stop, but at the same time I knew darn well that if did pull him out we'd never have enough offense to win the game - so it was a lose/lose situation very time.  Take him out and we don't have enough offense, leave him in and we get punished on defense.

What Thomas does at his size, in a league dominated by size, is amazing - and I have the greatest amount of respect for his fire, his passion, his clear desire to win and be great.  But there are a lot of sports commentators out there who believe that Boston will never be able to win a title as long as their best player is a 5'9" PG, and I have to say that watching some of those games last season make me start to believe that.  Thomas can't consistently outplay Kyrie 1-on-1.  He can't consistently outplay Steph Curry 1-on1.  Not in a 7 game series, those guys are just too big for him and will win the matchup most nights.  There isn't much you can do about that. 

In what universe is demanding a trade from the team you won a title with, that just went to The Finals, because you can't coexist with the best player in the world, NOT a locker room cancer? Maybe he got along with people in the past- sure- but NO evidence? That's like saying OJ isn't a murderer, except for that one Nicole thing. Don't underestimate the Flat Earth stuff, either. He's not just eccentric- he's a moron.

It's a valid theory that IT has a fatal flaw against top teams. But, we've been one of the better teams against CLE and GS the last two years *with* him on the court, so I'm not too convinced.

Maybe IT can't be your #1 guy and win a title. Since when has Irving even made the playoffs as a #1 guy? They both fail that test so far, and if anything IT has had more success "on his own" with a LeBron.

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #103 on: July 24, 2017, 11:52:17 PM »

Offline KGBirdBias

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1649
  • Tommy Points: 125
The only thing I haven't heard is...Kyrie is younger and isn't due for a contract for 2 years. That's the biggest reason to think about a deal.

IT has a Celtics mentality and I'm just interested to see what people think when it comes contract time. Are the Celtics going to pay two 30 year olds $23M+ for the next 3 years?

Re: Trade for Kyrie Irving (Merged News, Ideas & Rumors)
« Reply #104 on: July 24, 2017, 11:54:18 PM »

Offline aingeforthree

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2013
  • Tommy Points: 134
Quote
One is still unstoppable when you get to the playoffs and face Bradley-like defending. One gets shut down with good coaching and defending come playoff time.

I was literally just about to post the same thing. While they're equal offensive players in the regular season, in the playoffs Isaiah is shutdownable/houndable.

Are you guys seriously going to ignore the fact that Lebron was on court with the "unstoppable" Irving? 

IT was the only Real offensive option when he was "Stopped."   (Sully was trash, Turner was struggling, Bradly and Crowder were both dealing with injuries)

It's so hard to compare based on rosters, LeBron, etc.

So are you saying you'd take IT4 over Irving ? I haven't met a person who takes that.